Full Text
Translation output
VT'
/ $-35 to 37 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)814/2018,Crl. M.A.5109/2018
AMANDEEP SINGHJOHAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nikhil Borwankar, Mr. Roopenshu Pratap Singh, Mr. David Vijay Thomas and Mr. Barua Kaushik,Advs.
/ $-35 to 37 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)814/2018,Crl. M.A.5109/2018
AMANDEEP SINGHJOHAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nikhil Borwankar, Mr. Roopenshu Pratap Singh, Mr. David Vijay Thomas and Mr. Barua Kaushik,Advs.
VERSUS
STATE OF NOTOFDELHI&ANR Respondent
Through:Mr.Sanjay Lao,ASC for State with SI Kishore Kumar,P.S.Patel Nagar.
Mrs.Saran Preet,Complainant with Mr.Sachin Aggarwal,Adv.forthe complainant.
Through:Mr.Sanjay Lao,ASC for State with SI Kishore Kumar,P.S.Patel Nagar.
Mrs.Saran Preet,Complainant with Mr.Sachin Aggarwal,Adv.forthe complainant.
W.P.(CRL)1496/2018,Crl.M.As.9187/2018,9191/2018
HARVINDER KAUR JOHAR& ORS ..... Petitioner
Through:Mr.Pankaj Sharma and Mr.Vikram Singh Kushwaha,Advs.
HARVINDER KAUR JOHAR& ORS ..... Petitioner
Through:Mr.Pankaj Sharma and Mr.Vikram Singh Kushwaha,Advs.
VERSUS
STATE(NOT OF DELHI)&ANR Respondent
Through:Mrs.Saran Preet,Complainant with Mr. Sachin Aggarwal,Adv.forthe complainant.
Through:Mrs.Saran Preet,Complainant with Mr. Sachin Aggarwal,Adv.forthe complainant.
W.P.(CRL)837/2018,Crl. M.A.5213/2018
HARPREETKAUR CHANDHOK@SEEMA & ANR Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nikhil Borwankar, Mr. Roopenshu Pratap Singh, Mr. David Vijay Thomas and Mr. Barua Kaushik,Advs.
HARPREETKAUR CHANDHOK@SEEMA & ANR Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nikhil Borwankar, Mr. Roopenshu Pratap Singh, Mr. David Vijay Thomas and Mr. Barua Kaushik,Advs.
VERSUS
STATE OF NOT OF DELHI&ANR Respondent
Through:Mr.Sanjay Lao,ASC for State with SI Kishore Kumar,P.S.Patel Nagar.
Mrs.Saran Preet,Complainant with Mr.Sachin Aggarwal,Adv.forthe complainant.
Through:Mr.Sanjay Lao,ASC for State with SI Kishore Kumar,P.S.Patel Nagar.
Mrs.Saran Preet,Complainant with Mr.Sachin Aggarwal,Adv.forthe complainant.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI 2018:DHC:9187
07.08.2018 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are serious discrepancies in the original complaint filed by R-2. The
Charge-sheet has now been filed. He submits that there is manipulation withregardsthe petitioner'sincome,which initially was stated by the petitioner to be Rs.53,OOGA, subsequently it was made
Rs.1 lac per month. He also refers to other documents about stridhan which according to him have similar manipulation.
Mr.Sanjay Lao, the learned counsel for the State submits that since the Charge-sheethas now been filed,the petitioner has statutory remedy available to him and he may make similar arguments before the Trial Courtconcerned;he submitsthatthe petition is pre-mature.
In view ofthe above,the learned counsel forthe petitioner does not press the writ petition and seeks to withdraw the same with a request that the Trial Court may be requested to expedite hearing of arguments on Charge.
The learned counsel for the.State submits that the State too is interested in an expeditious trial and would make similar request to the Trial Court when the matter is listed.
The petition is disposed offin the above terms.
It will be always open to the parties to settle the lis by way of mediation.
[IWAZIREJ AUGUST 07,2018/acm 2018:DHC:9187
07.08.2018 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are serious discrepancies in the original complaint filed by R-2. The
Charge-sheet has now been filed. He submits that there is manipulation withregardsthe petitioner'sincome,which initially was stated by the petitioner to be Rs.53,OOGA, subsequently it was made
Rs.1 lac per month. He also refers to other documents about stridhan which according to him have similar manipulation.
Mr.Sanjay Lao, the learned counsel for the State submits that since the Charge-sheethas now been filed,the petitioner has statutory remedy available to him and he may make similar arguments before the Trial Courtconcerned;he submitsthatthe petition is pre-mature.
In view ofthe above,the learned counsel forthe petitioner does not press the writ petition and seeks to withdraw the same with a request that the Trial Court may be requested to expedite hearing of arguments on Charge.
The learned counsel for the.State submits that the State too is interested in an expeditious trial and would make similar request to the Trial Court when the matter is listed.
The petition is disposed offin the above terms.
It will be always open to the parties to settle the lis by way of mediation.
[IWAZIREJ AUGUST 07,2018/acm 2018:DHC:9187
JUDGMENT