Full Text
Translation output
$-25 to 28 (common order)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 3944/2015 & Crl.M.A. 13980/2015
ASHOK JAIPURIA & ANR Petitioners
Through: Mr.Madhav Khurana with Ms.Trisha Mittal, Advs.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 3944/2015 & Crl.M.A. 13980/2015
ASHOK JAIPURIA & ANR Petitioners
Through: Mr.Madhav Khurana with Ms.Trisha Mittal, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE &ANR Respondents
Through: Mr.P.U. Raghu, Adv. for R-2.
SI Pancham Kumar, PS Vijay Vihar.
Through: Mr.P.U. Raghu, Adv. for R-2.
SI Pancham Kumar, PS Vijay Vihar.
CRL.M.C. 3964/2015 & Crl.M.A. 14061/2015
P K JAIN Petitioner
P K JAIN Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Respondents
CRL.M.C. 3978/2015 & Crl.M.A. 14090/2015
RAJESH SRIVASTAVA Petitioner
RAJESH SRIVASTAVA Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Respondents
CRL.M.C. 4459/2015 & Crl.M.A. 15849-50/2015
ARUN YADAV Petitioner
Through
ARUN YADAV Petitioner
Through
VERSUS
STATE &ANR Respondents
CRL.M.C. 3944/2015 &conn. j qJ-2
2018:DHC:8348
2018:DHC:8348
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
27.08.2018 .
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petitions reserving the contentions set out herein as arguments on the stage of consideration of charge before the Trial Court, his ftirther request being that the petitioners may be permitted to avail of exemption from personal appearance granted during the pendency of these petitions till the question of charge has been addressed by the Trial Court. Counsel on being asked submitted that the petitioners have not yet appeared even once before the concerned court nor had applied for release on regular bail.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. The contentions raised in these petitions are reserved and may be agitated before theTrial Court at the time of consideration of charge. The petitioners are directed to appear in person with their counsel on the next date fixed by the Trial Court. They would have the liberty to move appropriate application for being admitted to bail and also to apply for exemption from personal appearance, in the proceedings before the trial court at Delhi, which requests shall be considered in accordance with law.
AUGUST 27, 2018
27.08.2018 .
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petitions reserving the contentions set out herein as arguments on the stage of consideration of charge before the Trial Court, his ftirther request being that the petitioners may be permitted to avail of exemption from personal appearance granted during the pendency of these petitions till the question of charge has been addressed by the Trial Court. Counsel on being asked submitted that the petitioners have not yet appeared even once before the concerned court nor had applied for release on regular bail.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. The contentions raised in these petitions are reserved and may be agitated before theTrial Court at the time of consideration of charge. The petitioners are directed to appear in person with their counsel on the next date fixed by the Trial Court. They would have the liberty to move appropriate application for being admitted to bail and also to apply for exemption from personal appearance, in the proceedings before the trial court at Delhi, which requests shall be considered in accordance with law.
AUGUST 27, 2018
CRL.M.C. 3944/2015 &conn. pagQ 2of2
2018:DHC:8348
2018:DHC:8348
JUDGMENT