Mithlesh & Anr v. Mukesh Kumar & Ors

Delhi High Court · 09 Aug 2018 · 2018:DHC:5000
Sunil Gaur
MAC.APP. 389/2018
2018:DHC:5000
civil appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court held that a duly verified Aadhaar Card is valid proof of residence for establishing territorial jurisdiction and set aside the dismissal of a Motor Accident claim petition on that ground.

Full Text
Translation output
MAC.APP. 389/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: August 09, 2018
MAC.APP. 389/2018 & CM 15368/2018
MITHLESH & ANR ..... Appellants
Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates
VERSUS
MUKESH KUMAR & ORS (THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD) .....Respondents
Through: Mr. S.P. Jain, Mr. Himanshu Gambhir, Ms. Amandeep Kaur and
Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. Impugned order of 28th November, 2017 dismisses appellants’ claim petition on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction while refusing to rely upon copy of Aadhaar card, which was duly verified by the concerned SHO. On the last date of hearing, records were requisitioned.

2. Learned counsel for appellants submits that Aadhaar Card is a valid proof of identity as well as of residence and the Tribunal has erred in not relying upon it.

3. Upon hearing and on perusal of impugned order of 28th November, 2017 and the record of this case, I find that first appellant’s Aadhaar Card 2018:DHC:5000 MAC.APP. 389/2018 has been duly verified by the concerned SHO. The second appellant is a minor. There is no basis to discard the Aadhaar Card as proof of residence. The Tribunal has erred in returning appellants’ claim petition on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.

4. In view of aforesaid, impugned order is hereby set aside with direction to the Tribunal to proceed with appellants’ claim petition in accordance with the law. Records be remitted back forthwith. Parties to appear before the concerned Tribunal on 10th September, 2018.

5. With aforesaid directions, this appeal and the application are disposed of.

JUDGE AUGUST 09, 2018 s