Full Text
BAIL APPLN.1656/2018
AJAY VERMA@GAUTU VBRMA@ GAURI GHATA Represented by:
Petitioner Mr.Shailendra Singh,Ms. Gitanjali Malviya,Ms.Sana-
UL-Haq,Mr.Dayanand Sharma and Mr.Purushendra Bhardwaj,Advocates. versus-
STATE(NOT OF DELHI)
Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with SI Krishan Lai,PS Kalyan
Puri.
KALU@KALIGHATA
Petitioner Mr.Shailendra Singh,Ms. Gitanjali Malviya,Ms.Sana-
UL-Haq,Mr.Dayanand Sharma and Mr.Purushendra Bhardwaj,Advocates.
Respondent Ms.Rajni Gupta,APP with SI Krishan Lai,PS Kalyan Puri.
2018:DHC:8236 L
ORDER o/„ 28.08.2018
JUDGMENT
1. By these petitions,the petitioners seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No.236/2018 under Sections 308/341/506/34 IPG registered at PS Kalyan Puri on the complaintofone Chandni.
2. Inthe abovenotedFIRChandniallegedthaton26''^ May,2018 he had goneto the area for begging along with his friends,namely,Simran,Saloni and Ajij and when they reached 18 Block,Kalyan Puri at about 11:00 AM, Ajay @ Mala, Kalu @ Kali Ghata the petitioner in bail application NO. 1663/2018,Hari@Mamta and Babloo@Gori Ghata,the petitioner in bail applicationNo.1656/2018 werecomingfromthe opposite side.They started abusing them and said that ifthey beg in Kalyan Puri and Khichipur area, they shall be killed. When Chandni and her friends restrained them,they attacked them.The allegations are that Babloo @ Ajay Verma picked up a danda from the street and started beating the complainant, when the associate,Simran,tried to save Chandni,Kali Ghata caught hold ofher and Babloo gave dandablow on her and whenthey tried to escape Ajay@Mala and Hari@ Mamta blocked their way and threw halfbricks due to which they sustained injuries.
3. A perusal ofthe MLCreveals that Chandni,Simran and Ajij received injuries whereas from the side of the petitioners MFCs of Neetu, Mala, Sonam, Kashish and Hari were prepared which noted abrasions/bruises, injuries being opined to be simple in nature. Further Chandni received one lacerated wound on the left ear and rest ofthe injuries were in the nature of abrasions/bruises. BAILAPPLN.1656/2018andconn,matter page2of[3]
4. Anticipatory bail has already been granted to Hari@Mamta by this Court vide order dated 9'^ July,2018.Considering the factthatin the FIR in questionthere is no mention whatsoever asto how injuries werereceived by the other side and as co-accused similarly placed has also been granted anticipatory bail, this Court deems it fit to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. It is, therefore, directed that in the event of arrest the petitioners be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of^25,000/each with onesurety bond each ofthelike amount,subjecttothe satisfaction ofthe Arresting Officer/SHO concerned,further subjectto the conditionthat the petitioners will join the investigation as and when directed by the Investigating Officerand will notleavethe country withoutprior permission ofthe Courtconcerned and in case ofchange ofresidential addressthe same will beintimatedtothe Courtconcerned by way ofan affidavit.
6. Petitions are disposed of.
7. Order dasti.