Mohammad Suhail & Ors v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors

Delhi High Court · 03 Aug 2018 · 2018:DHC:9100

Mukta Gupta

W.P.(CRL)1988/2017

2018:DHC:9100

criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed two criminal writ petitions for non-prosecution due to petitioners' non-appearance and failure to file vakalatnama.

Full Text

21# & 22# $~ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)1988/2017
MOHAMMAD SUHAIL & ORS Petitioners Represented by: None.

VERSUS

THE STATE(GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI)& ORS Respondents
Represented by: Ms.Amita Sachdeva,Advocate for Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel with SI Deepak Kumar,PS
Malviya Nagar.

W.P.(CRL)1993/2017
SAHIL AHMED & ORS Petitioner Represented by: None.

VERSUS

THE STATE(GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI)& ORS Respondents
Represented by: Ms.Amita Sachdeva,Advocate for Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel with SI Deepak Kumar,PS
Malviya Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
03.08.2018

ORDER

1. Despite pass-over none appears on behalfofthe petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners was also required to file the vakalatnama in favour of the petitioners however, the same has not been filed. W.P. (CRL)1988/2017 1993/2017 Page[1] of[2] 2018:DHC:9100

3. Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. [& AUGUST03,2018 'vn' MUKTA GUPTA,J

Mohammad Suhail & Ors v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors

AI Summary

Full Text

ORDER

Contact Us for a Free Consultation