Ram Bhajan Singh v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr

Delhi High Court · 28 Aug 2018 · 2018:DHC:5463-DB

Siddharth Mridul

W.P.(C) 9036/2018

2018:DHC:5463-DB

administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the NCTE to inform the petitioner about the status of his B.Ed. course recognition application and to process it expeditiously once procedural requirements are met.

Full Text

W.P.(C) 9036/2018
#100 HIGH COURT OF DELHI

JUDGMENT

delivered on: 28.08.2018 RAM BHAJAN SINGH ..... Petitioner

versus

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR ..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mayank Manish and Mr. Ravi Kant, Advocates
For the Respondents : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi and Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

JUDGMENT

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India instituted on behalf of the petitioner prays as follows:-

“A. Issue an appropriate writ(s)/direction(s) or order(s) directing to respondent No.2 to intimate the current status of the petitioner institution application bearing 2018:DHC:5463-DB application ID No.NCRAPP13840 dated 23.06.2015, and/or;

B. Direct the respondents to process the application of the petitioner institution for the B.Ed. course; and/or

C. Pass any such other order/directions as this Hon’ble

2. The petitioner had applied to the National Council for Teacher Education (for short ‘NCTE’) vide its application No.NRCAPP13840 dated 23.06.2015, seeking recognition for starting a B.Ed course for the academic session 2016-17.

3. In terms of the NCTE communication dated 07.09.2016, it is evident that the concerned State Government is required to furnish its recommendation on the petitioner’s application to the office of the concerned Regional Committee of the NCTE. It is only thereafter that, the NCTE will take up the petitioner’s application for consideration.

4. In this behalf, it is observed that the NCTE vide its communication dated 07.09.2016 addressed to the Principal Secretary, Basic Education, Government of Uttar Pradesh, asked the latter to forward their recommendation, in relation to the petitioner’s application to the concerned Regional Committee of the NCTE within 45 days.

5. The petitioner is yet to receive any communication from the NCTE, in relation to the said representation dated 23.06.2015.

6. In view of the foregoing, it is considered just, necessary and expedient to direct the NCTE to inform the petitioner about the current status of the latter’s application dated 23.06.2015, within four weeks from today.

7. With the above directions, the writ petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL (JUDGE) AUGUST 28, 2018 dn

Ram Bhajan Singh v. National Council for Teacher Education & Anr

AI Summary

Full Text

JUDGMENT

Contact Us for a Free Consultation