TELEVISION EIGHTEEN INDIA LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Delhi High Court · 30 Aug 2018 · 2018:DHC:9239-DB
Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar
W.P.(C) 14147/2009
2018:DHC:9239-DB
tax petition_allowed

AI Summary

Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of writ petitions on tax issues covered by Supreme Court precedents, permitting petitioners to raise contentions before tax authorities.

Full Text
Translation output
r HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 11374/2009
SURYA FOOD & AGRO LTD. Petitioner
Through Dr. Shashwat Bajpai and Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Advocates
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Through None And
W.P. (C) 13891/2009
ACCESS EQUITY PVT. LTD.
VERSUS
Respondents .Petitioner
Through Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI And
W.P. (C) 14147/2009
TELEVISION EIGHTEEN INDIA LTD. Petitioner
Through Mr. MayankNagi, Advocate
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents
Through Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI And
W.P. (C) 14188/2009
BIRD TRAVELS (P) LTD. Petitioner
Through Mr. Mayank Nagi, Advocate
VERSUS
Through Mr. Anurag Ahluwdia, CGSC for UOI 2018:DHC:9239-DB r
W.P.(C) 804/2010
IBN 18 BROADCAST LIMITED Petitioner
VERSUS
Through Mr. Anurag AhluwaHa, CGSC for UOI And
W.P.(C) 818/2010
NETWORK 18 MEDIA & INVESTMENTS LTD Petitioner
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent
Through Mr. Anurag Ahluwaiia, CGSC for UOI And
W.R(C) 3116/2010
RHC HOLDING PVT. LTD. & ANR Petitioner
VERSUS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
30.08.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioners state that the issue raised in the present writ petitions is now covered by the
ORDER
of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax, 5 Mumbai vs. Essar Teleholdings Ltd.

(2018) 401 ITR445 (SC). It is further stated that Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in Godrez & Boyce Manufacturing r Co. Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax and Another, (2017) 394 ITR449 (SC). In view of the aforesaid decisions, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to raise all the contentions and issues before the Assessing Officer, and ifrequired and necessary in the appellate proceedings.. Taking the statement on record, we dispose of the present writ petitions without any order of costs. We clarify that this Court has not examined the specific facts and has not given any specific direction and opinion.

SANJIV KHANNA, J CHANDm SHEKHAR, J AUGUST 30,2018 b