Full Text
Translation output
$-50 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date ofdecision: 3V'August, 2018
Date ofdecision: 3V'August, 2018
W.P.(C) 9175/2018
RAJ KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Dr. Nirmal Chopra and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advs.
RAJ KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Dr. Nirmal Chopra and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advs.
VERSUS
CORPORATION BANK AM) ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr. Jagat Arora and Mr. Rajat . .Arora,.Advs.
Through: Mr. Jagat Arora and Mr. Rajat . .Arora,.Advs.
CORAM: •
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HAki SHANKAR OR PER (ORAL)
The prayer in this writ petition;ds;,ji)r issuance ofa direction, to the respondent no.2, to petition filed by the
. , 1 ;T' i'.} petitioner in a time bound ' v
'. _. .•./' ..
Mr. Jagat Arora, learned counsel for the respondent fairly does not oppose this prayer. ^ ^^.'n]
This writ petition is accordingly allowed by directing the respondents to decide the review petition filed by the petitioner within a period of four months.
C.Hi AUGUST 31,2018/kr Rfj \ 2018:DHC:9267
The prayer in this writ petition;ds;,ji)r issuance ofa direction, to the respondent no.2, to petition filed by the
. , 1 ;T' i'.} petitioner in a time bound ' v
'. _. .•./' ..
Mr. Jagat Arora, learned counsel for the respondent fairly does not oppose this prayer. ^ ^^.'n]
This writ petition is accordingly allowed by directing the respondents to decide the review petition filed by the petitioner within a period of four months.
C.Hi AUGUST 31,2018/kr Rfj \ 2018:DHC:9267
JUDGMENT