Rajiv Sehgal v. Preeti Sehgal & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 07 Sep 2018 · 2018:DHC:8349
R. K. Gauba
CRL.M.C. 2225/2015 & CRL.M.A. 7859/2015
2018:DHC:8349
criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of criminal petitions, dismissing them as withdrawn while permitting the petitioners to raise their defenses during the ongoing trial.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 2225/2015 & CRL.M.A. 7859/2015
RAJIV SEHGAL
Through:
VERSUS
PREETI SEHGAL &ANR.
Through:
SARLA SEHGAL & ANR
Through:
VERSUS
PREETI SEHGAL 8c ANR.
Through:
SEPTEMBER 07, 2018 nk Petitioner Mr. Anil Soni & Mr. Bharat Bhushan
Gupta, Advs. Respondents Mr. A. Maitri & Ms.Radhika, Advs. for
R-1.
Mr. Ravi Nayak, AFP for the State v^ith ASI Ram Lakhan, PS Roop Nagar.
CRL.M.C. 2230/2015 & CRL.M.A. 7876/2015
Petitioners Mr. Anil Soni & Mr. Bharat Bhushan
Gupta, Advs. Respondents Mr. A. Maitri& Ms. Radhika, Advs. for
R-1.
Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with ASI Ram Lakhan, PS Roop Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
07.09.2018 After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition reserving all the contentions set out in these petitions to be agitated as defences during the trial pending before the court ofMagistrate.
The petitions and pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
BA, J 2018:DHC:8349
JUDGMENT