Dr. Deepak Dahiya v. University Grants Commission and Anr.

Delhi High Court · 07 Sep 2018 · 2018:DHC:5788
Siddharth Mridul
W.P.(C) 9389/2018
2018:DHC:5788
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the University Grants Commission to respond within four weeks to a government communication, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 9389/2018
#62 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 07.09.2018 DR. DEEPAK DAHIYA ..... Petitioner
versus
UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION AND ANR. ..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioners : Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Mr. Apoorv Kurup and Mr. Avanish Rathi, Advocates for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
JUDGMENT
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL)

1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner limits the relief in the present petition to a direction to the University Grants Commission (for short ‘UGC’) to respond to the communication dated 26.06.2018 annexed as Annexure P-8 addressed by the Joint Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Rajasthan to the UGC.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the UGC, on advance notice states that, they shall respond to the said communication dated 2018:DHC:5788 26.06.2018, within a period of four weeks from today, under intimation to the petitioner, if not already done.

3. Directed accordingly.

4. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No further directions are called for.

5. A copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties under the signatures of Court Master.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 07, 2018 p’ma