CAN SUPPORT (NGO) v. DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD

Delhi High Court · 05 Sep 2018 · 2018:DHC:9254-DB
THE CHIEF JUSTICE; V. KAMESWAR RAO
LPA 522/2018
2018:DHC:9254-DB
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant interim occupation of premises until February 1, 2019, directing vacation thereafter and consideration of alternate site application by the competent authority.

Full Text
Translation output
^4 t? * jpRJ If* '"^1.
-' -
•y.
■ii
> i''* ' ''.< r^,j *' )-> 4?,^;#; -;.r '
•Uf/^ ^ iii
'Vj
• .
I* , UV >«iV ' f^l'v:15iv ^ 'j;;£;_ , ^ SfiiMfefi:"
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
LPA 522/2018, CMNos. 36684-36685/2018
CAN SUPPORT (NGO)
Through; Mr. RaghavendraBajaj, Adv. with Ms. Renu Verma & Mr. Birbal Mahato, Advs.
VERSUS
DELHI URBAN SHELTERIMPROVEMENT BOARD
Through: Mi. Parvinder Chauhan, SC with Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. for R-l/DUSIB
Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Adv. for
R-2AJ0I Ms. ZubedaBegum,Adv. with Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. for R-3/Rajya
Sabha Secretariat
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
ORDER o/o 10.09.2018 I V CM No. 36685/2018 (for exemption^
. " f- .t'
■ I fa 522/2018 i."
' .r. . I Seeking Exemption allowed subject to alljust exceptions.
Application stands disposed of. setting aside oforder dated September 05,2018 passedby the
Writ Court in W.P.(C) No. 9344/2018, Uiis appeal has been filed under
' '
"A t isiSs? h ' s'fefi;.":-- mim-
IU„- w'' .cv V f .V
2018:DHC:9254-DB se 10 ofthe Letter Patents.
Eventhough,various grounds areraisedinthe appealchallengingthe jrlocutoryorderpassedbythe WritCourtrefusing grantofinterimrelief, making submissions for some time,learned counsel for the appellant
;htfortimeto seekinstructions,thereforethe matteriskeptat2.15 pm.
1^.15pm,learnedcounselfortheappellant,oninstructionsinformsusthat appellant is willing to vacate the premises on or before L'February, 9and further praysthatin case an application is submitted for grant of lemate site or land in lieu ofvacating the present premises,the same be
^sideredand decisionbetakenbythe CompetentAutiorityin accordance
LW.
Having considered the aforesaid submissions and heard the learned
,unselfortheparties,weareoftheconsideredviewthatthisappealandthe it petition being W.P.(C)No.9344/2018 itselfcan be disposed of,m the following manner;-
(i) The appellant shall be permitted to continue in the premises in
'A. . ■ ' questiontill 1'^February,2019;
(ii) The appellant shall vacate the premises on or before 1 February, 2019and hand overthe vacantpossession ofthe premisesto therespondent
.I--,'.
■ -v -
•i'L m j
■'M il
-'m ;,iMf
•"41
•4

°#5- - ■ ' " ■ ' ■ . ■ ' o l who shall dealwiththe samein accordance withlaw;
J(iii) The appellantis also granted hberty to file an application before the
'4'?' ^ " Competent-Authority seeking grant ofalternate site for the same purpose
J and the Competent Authority may consider the application and decide the
®withinareasonable period,in accordance withlaw, limm: appellant is directed to furnish an undertaking to the aforesaid
IfetheRegistrarGeneralofthisCourtwithinoneweekfromtoday; v) The premises in question be de-sealed within two days from today ind possessionbehanded overtothe appellant.
In view ofthe above.
Writ Petition (Civil)No. 9344/2018 and the
'4'presentappealstand disposed of.
'
CM No.366S4/20i8(forstay)
Dismissed as infructuous. i:
.■'•SJijiS. ■•ssfsM zM
Z
^' '^1.
■ M r; ss
IPTEMBERIO, 2018M CEMF JXJSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
" ' ^ \ 4.
>r 4'. -• f'i. w.
SKS:'- v;. ' ■
•iffJv;
SE' \
JUDGMENT