Ram Gyan and Anr. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi High Court · 22 Sep 2025 · 2025:DHC:8431
Ravinder Dudeja
W.P.(CRL)1599/2025
2025:DHC:8431
criminal petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(CRL)1599/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 22.09.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, W.P.(CRL) 1599/2025
RAM GYAN AND ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Petitioners are also present in person
VERSUS
THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Yashir Rauf Ansari, ASC (criminal)
WITH
Mr. Mohit Raj
Nagar, Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocates and SI Mahesh
Kumawat, PS Bhalaswa Dairy Mr. Vijay Pandey, Advocate for
R-2 Respondent No. 2 is present in person
CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 484/2016, dated 23.09.2016, registered at P.S Bhalswa Dairy, Delhi under Sections420/467/471/506/120B IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

2. As per averments made in the FIR, petitioners illegally occupied respondent no. 2’s plot at Janta Vihar, Mukandpur, using a forged GPA and forcibly tying a cattle and building a slum. FIR NO. 484/2016 was lodged at instance of respondent no. 2 under sections 420/467/471/506/120B IPC against the petitioners.

3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of the compromise were reduced into writing in the form of a Settlement Deed/MOU dated 18.02.2025. In view of the aforesaid settlement, petitioners have paid the entire settlement amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lacs) to respondent no. 2. Copy of the Settlement Deed/MOU dated 18.02.2025 has been annexed as Annexure B.

4. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Mahesh Kumawat from PS Bhalaswa Dairy.

5. Respondent no. 2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and he has received the entire settlement amount and has no objection if the FIR No. 484/2016is quashed against the petitioners.

6. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 484/2016 is quashed.

7. In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon’ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-

"61. In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings."

8. Further, it is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Reliance may be placed upon B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana,

9. In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice, to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

10. The petition is allowed, and the FIR No. 484/2016, dated 23.09.2016, registered at P.S Bhalswa Dairy, Delhi under section 420/ 467/ 471/ 506/120B IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed.

11. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

12. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.