Dr. Aditya Sehrawat v. Union of India and Ors

Delhi High Court · 22 Sep 2025 · 2025:DHC:8501-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla
W.P.(C) 14343/2023
2025:DHC:8501-DB
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh and granted interim protection from compliance with the impugned order until 10 October 2025 on medical grounds.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 14343/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 14343/2023 and CM APPL.56819/2023
DR. ADITYA SEHRAWAT .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, Advocate, CGSC and Mr. Shubham Chaturvedi, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL)
22.09.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to institute a fresh writ petition challenging the speaking order passed by the respondent. However, he prays that his client may be protected till 10 October 2025 as he has to visit the doctors at the Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences following liver transplant undergone by him.

2. Without intending it to be treated as a precedent, we protect the petitioner from having to comply with the impugned order till 10 October 2025. W.P.(C) 14343/2023

3. The writ petition is disposed of, in the aforesaid terms.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J. SEPTEMBER 22, 2025