Sanjeev Narula v. State

Delhi High Court · 14 Sep 2018 · 2018:DHC:8262
R. K. Gauba
CRL.M.C. 3753/2016
2018:DHC:8262
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw multiple criminal miscellaneous petitions with a reservation of rights to raise all contentions during trial, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 3753/2016 and Crl.M.C.15713/2016
SANJEEV NARULA & ANR. Petitioners
Through: Mr. Mudit Jain, Advocate with Ms. Hemlata Khrayat and
Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Advocates along with petitioner in person.
VERSUS
STATE & ORS.
Through:
Respondents Mr. Mukesh Kumar, AFP for the State
Mr. Ateev Mathur, Adv. with Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, &
Mr. Amol Sharma, Advocate for R-2.
CRL.M.C. 3761/2016 and Crl.M.A.15735/2016
SANJEEV NARULA
Through:
Petitioner Mr. Mudit Jain, Advocate with
VERSUS
M/S WOODCRAFTS FURNISHERS & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Vikas Nagwan, Advocatewith Mr. Yogesh Aggarwal, &
Mr. Kamal Jindal, Advocates
CRL.M.C. 4620/2016 and Crl.M.C.18289/2016
SANJEEV NARULA
Through:
VERSUS
CRL.M.C. 3753/20]6 Etc.
Petitioner Mr. Mudit Jain, Advocate with Page 1 of4
2018:DHC:8262 M/S. WOODCRAFT FURNISHERS &ANR Respondents
Through: Mr. Vikas Nagwan, Advocate with
CRL.M.C. 4621/2016 and Crl.M.C.19291/2016
SANJEEVNARULA petitioner along with petitioner inperson.
VERSUS
M/S. WOODCRAFT FURNISHER &ANR Respondents
CRL.M.C. 4622/2016 and Crl.M.C.19293/2016
SANJEEVNARULA Petitioner along with petitioner inperson.
VERSUS
M/S. WOODCRAFT FURNISEDERS &ANR Respondents Mr. YogeshAggarwal, &
CRL.M.C. 4623/2016 and CrI.M.C.19295/2016
SANJEEVNARULA Petitioner
CRLMC. 3753/2016 Etc.
VERSUS
Through: Mr. VikasNagwan, Advocate with
CRL.M.C. 4626/2016 and Crl.M.C.19305-19306/2016
SANJEEV NARULA Petitioner V' Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Advocates
VERSUS
Through: Mr. Vikas Nagwan, Advocatewith
CRL.M.C. 4627/2016 and CrI.M.C.19307/2016
SANJEEV NARULA Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Mr. Vikas Nagwan,Advocatewith
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
CRL.M.C. 3753/2016 Etc. Page 3 of4
14.09.2018 After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petitions and the applications filed therewith, reserving the right to raise all the contentions set out in these petitions as defence during the trial and at the time offinal adjudication ofthe complaint cases which are pending before the trial court.
The petitions and the applications filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn.
SEPTEMBER 14, 2018 vk
CRL.M.C. 3753/2016 Etc.
R.K.GAuBA, J.
Page 4 of4
JUDGMENT