Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)3123/2018
RAM AVTAR AGGARWAL
Petitioner liV TT z Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Sainiand Mr.DilipKumar, Advocates
W.P.(CRL)3123/2018
RAM AVTAR AGGARWAL
Petitioner liV TT z Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Sainiand Mr.DilipKumar, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE(NCTOFDELHI)&ANR Respondents Represented by; Mr.R.S.Kundu,ASCforthe State ^ with Ms.Suman Saharan,Mr.Murli
Manohar Prajapati and Mr.Ravinder Kumar,Advocates and SIRajender
Singh,PS Geeta Colony Mr.Dinesh Tiwari,Advocate for R-2
Manohar Prajapati and Mr.Ravinder Kumar,Advocates and SIRajender
Singh,PS Geeta Colony Mr.Dinesh Tiwari,Advocate for R-2
W.P.(CRL)3131/2018
AJIT KUMAR MANUAL
Represented by;
Petitioner Mr.Rajiv Saini and Mr.Dilip Kumar, Advocates
AJIT KUMAR MANUAL
Represented by;
Petitioner Mr.Rajiv Saini and Mr.Dilip Kumar, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE(NCTOFDELHI)&ANR Respondents Represented by; Ms.ItiPandey,Advocatefor
Ms.Nandita Rao,ASC for the State and SIRajender Singh,PS Geeta
Colony Mr.Dinesh Tiwari,Advocate for R-2
Ms.Nandita Rao,ASC for the State and SIRajender Singh,PS Geeta
Colony Mr.Dinesh Tiwari,Advocate for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
10.10.2018
10.10.2018
W.P.(CRL)3123/2018& coniumatter page 1 of2
2018:DHC:8870 y r-rl.M.A.NQ-33981/2018 in W.P.fCrl.'l No.3123/2Q18 rr1.M.A.No.34019/2018 in W.P/Crl.)No.3131/2018
Allowed subjecttojust exceptions.
W.P.CCrl.)Nos.3123/2018 & 3131^2018 By these petitions, the two petitioners seek quashing of FIR
No.41/2018 under Sections 323/342/386/506/34 IPG registered atPS Geeta
Colony onthe complaintofrespondentNo.2.
Mr.R.S.Kundu, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State opposing the two petitions at the outset submits that besides the two petitioners there are three other accused and the allegations m the FIR are serious in nature.
Having considered the allegations in the FIR and Section 386 IPG already being invoked during the investigation which is a serious offence, this Court finds no ground to quash the FIR in question on the basis of compromise.
Petitions are dismissed.
OCTOBER 10,2018 mamta MUKTA GUPTA, T. W.P.
(CRL)3123/2018& comumatter 2018:DHC:8870
2018:DHC:8870 y r-rl.M.A.NQ-33981/2018 in W.P.fCrl.'l No.3123/2Q18 rr1.M.A.No.34019/2018 in W.P/Crl.)No.3131/2018
Allowed subjecttojust exceptions.
W.P.CCrl.)Nos.3123/2018 & 3131^2018 By these petitions, the two petitioners seek quashing of FIR
No.41/2018 under Sections 323/342/386/506/34 IPG registered atPS Geeta
Colony onthe complaintofrespondentNo.2.
Mr.R.S.Kundu, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State opposing the two petitions at the outset submits that besides the two petitioners there are three other accused and the allegations m the FIR are serious in nature.
Having considered the allegations in the FIR and Section 386 IPG already being invoked during the investigation which is a serious offence, this Court finds no ground to quash the FIR in question on the basis of compromise.
Petitions are dismissed.
OCTOBER 10,2018 mamta MUKTA GUPTA, T. W.P.
(CRL)3123/2018& comumatter 2018:DHC:8870
JUDGMENT