Full Text
ITA 689/2018 and 690/2018
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) ')
JUDGMENT
210026 Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel for Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue.
VERSUS
SAINIK MINING & ALLIED SERVICES LTD Respondent Through: Mr. HarpreetSinghAjmani, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER 10.10.2018 - Though adjournment slip has been circulated by the rnun,-ip] for the Revenue, learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue states that the tax effect in the present appeals is below Rs.50 lacs and, therefore, in terms of Circular No. 3/2018 dated ll"^ July, 2018 the appeal may be disposed of, without examining and deciding the issue/question raised. It may be clarified thatthe issue/question is left open. Recording the aforesaid statement, the appeal is disposed of, without answering the issue/question raised, which is left open. Ifthe present appeal 2018:DHC:8318-DB falls unde^exception, it will be open to the Revenue to file an application for revival. -•(/ SANJIVKHANNA, J. [AT^DmS CHANDER SHEKHAR, J. OCTOBER 10, 2018 MR ^ 2018:DHC:8318-DB
JUDGMENT