Full Text
Translation output
$-11 to 13 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1435/2016 & Crl.M.A. 6092/2017
PARAMJIT SINGH KHURANA Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajesh Sharma & Mr. Nitya Sharma, Advs.
CRL.M.C. 1435/2016 & Crl.M.A. 6092/2017
PARAMJIT SINGH KHURANA Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajesh Sharma & Mr. Nitya Sharma, Advs.
VERSUS
THE STATE & ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State.
Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advs. for R-2 along with R-2 in person.
Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State.
Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advs. for R-2 along with R-2 in person.
CRL.M.C. 1495/2016
VERSUS
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents
CRL.M.C. 1497/2016
VERSUS
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents
CRL.M.C. 1435/2016 & conn. Page I of2
2018:DHC:8258
2018:DHC:8258
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
ORDER o/o 23.10.2018 After some hearing, the learned counsel representing the second respondent in each of these three petitions, on instructions from Mr. Devender Singh, respondent no.2, who is present in person on his behalf and also on behalf of two others, submits that he fairly concedes, without prejudice to his defences, that the order ofthe revisional court may be set aside and that the trial may proceed in terms of the order dated 21.01.2013 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate whereby charges were found made out and formally framed in its wake. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be disposed of in view of this concession.
The impugned order of the revisional court dated 01.03.2014 is set aside. The order dated 21.01.2013 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate passed on the file of criminal case arising out of the FIR NO. 229/2005 stands revived and restored.
The formal charges have already been framed. The trial court shall take up the case for further proceedings in accordance with law on 4^*^
December, 2018 when the parties may appear before the said court.
The petitions are disposed of in above terms.
R.K.GAUB^, J OCTOBER 23, 2018 nk
ORDER o/o 23.10.2018 After some hearing, the learned counsel representing the second respondent in each of these three petitions, on instructions from Mr. Devender Singh, respondent no.2, who is present in person on his behalf and also on behalf of two others, submits that he fairly concedes, without prejudice to his defences, that the order ofthe revisional court may be set aside and that the trial may proceed in terms of the order dated 21.01.2013 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate whereby charges were found made out and formally framed in its wake. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be disposed of in view of this concession.
The impugned order of the revisional court dated 01.03.2014 is set aside. The order dated 21.01.2013 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate passed on the file of criminal case arising out of the FIR NO. 229/2005 stands revived and restored.
The formal charges have already been framed. The trial court shall take up the case for further proceedings in accordance with law on 4^*^
December, 2018 when the parties may appear before the said court.
The petitions are disposed of in above terms.
R.K.GAUB^, J OCTOBER 23, 2018 nk
CRLM.C. 1435/2016 & com. Page 2 of2
2018:DHC:8258
2018:DHC:8258
JUDGMENT