Sh. Ravi @ Man Singh v. State & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 15 Oct 2018 · 2018:DHC:6743
Sanjeev Sachdeva
CRL.M.C. 5289/2018
2018:DHC:6743
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354-A, 354-D, 336, and 509 IPC based on a compromise between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 5289/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on:15.10.2018
CRL.M.C. 5289/2018
SH. RAVI @ MAN SINGH ..... Petitioner
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Singh Bagga, Adv.
For the Respondents : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with SI Jeetendra Singh
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
15.10.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 505 of 2013 under Sections 354-A/354-D/336/509 of the IPC, Police Station Saraswati Vihar, based on a settlement.

2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner had misbehaved with the complainant and when she objected he abused her.

3. Learned counsel for the parties submits that the parties have settled their disputes with the intervention of friends and family members and compromise deed dated 14.08.2018 has been executed between the parties. Petitioner has apologised to the respondent No.2 and she has accepted the 2018:DHC:6743 CRL.M.C. 5289/2018 apology.

4. Parties are neighbours. Petitioner has expressed remorse and regretted his conduct and undertakes that he shall not repeat the same in future. The undertaking is accepted.

5. Respondent No.2 is present in Court in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has settled the disputes with the petitioner and does not wish to prosecute the complaint any further and has no objection to the quashing of the subject FIR.

6. In view of the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes and respondent No. 2 does not wish to press her complaint, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.

7. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 505 of 2013 under Sections 354-A/354-D/336/509 of the IPC, Police Station Saraswati Vihar and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

8. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

OCTOBER 15, 2018/ rs’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J