Full Text
$-24 & 25 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 8605/2017
SANJAY AND ANR. Petitioners
Through Mr. A.K. Singh, Advocate
Through Mr. Chiranjeev Kumar &]^. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocates for Respondent
Nos.l &2
SATISH KUMAR Petitioner
Through Mr. A.K. Singh, Advocate
Through Ms. Amrita Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Manish Singh and
Mr. Harishankar Sharma Advocates for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2
31.10.2018
ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the Respondents, on instructions, states that the Petitioner's claim is indeed covered by the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 3636/2016 (Braham Prakash v. Union of India iSi other ConnectedMatters) dated 16* October 2018. 2018:DHC:8829-DB 4r J //
2. In that view of the matter, these writ petitions are allowed and the Respondents are directed to immediately refix the basic pay/salary of the Petitioners as per recommendations of the 6^^ Central Pay Commission in terms of the similar relief granted by this Court to the Petitioners in the aforementioned Writ Petition (C) 3636 of2016.
3. Consequential orders be passed no later than eight weeks from today.
4. Both writ petitions are disposed of in the above terms. IDHAR, J SANJEEVNARULA, J. OCTOBER 31, 2018 mw