Shai-Hd Khan Saifi v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr

Delhi High Court · 19 Nov 2018 · 2018:DHC:8597
Sanjeev Sachdeva
CRL.REV.P. 168/2017
2018:DHC:8597
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging interim maintenance orders as infructuous after the Trial Court passed a final maintenance order, preserving the right to challenge the final order.

Full Text
Translation output
$-25-27 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.REV.P. 168/2017 & Crl.M.A.3613/2017
SHAI-HD KHAN SAIFI Petitioner
Through: Mr.J.M.Bari, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELFH &ANR Respondents
Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, AFP.
Mr.Vijayalaxmi Jha, Adv. for R-2.
CRL.REV.P. 542/2017 & Crl.M.A.11952/2017
SHAFED KFIAN SAIFI Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE GOVT OFNCTDELFII & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr.FIirein Sharma, APP.
CRL.REV.P. 740/2017 & Crl.M.A. 16351/2017
SHAI-IID KHAN SAIFI Petitioner y
VERSUS
STATE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR...
Respondents
Through: Mr.FIirein Sharma, APP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
19.11.2018
CRL.REV.IM 68/2017- 542/2017 & 740/2017
2018:DHC:8597
ORDER

1. Petitioner has filed these petitions impugning an interim order assessing maintenance.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that final order has already been passed by the Trial Court on 16.10.2018 and in view thereof these orders have merged with the final order and petitioner seeks to file a petition impugning the final order. He submits that in viewof the final order having been passed, these petitions have become infructuous subject to his right to challenge the final order.

3. In view of the above, petitions are dismissed as infructuous.

4. All rights and contentions oftheparties are reserved. CRL,RLiV.P.168/2()17. 542/2017 & 740/2017 I SANOTV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER 19, 2018 rk