Full Text
Translation output
f1 $-3 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MAC.APP.22/2016& CM.APPL.944/2016
THENEWINDIA ASSURNCE COLTD Appellant
Through Mr.J.P.N.Shahi, Ms.Shivangi Krishna, Ms.Komal Dhingra Advocates.
MAC.APP.22/2016& CM.APPL.944/2016
THENEWINDIA ASSURNCE COLTD Appellant
Through Mr.J.P.N.Shahi, Ms.Shivangi Krishna, Ms.Komal Dhingra Advocates.
VERSUS
RAMNARESH&ORS Respondents nnn A Through Mr.S.N.Parashar,Advocate
CUKAM:
HON'BLEMR.JUSTICE YOGESHKHANNA MR.K.VENKATRAMAN,ADVOCATE,CO-MEMBER
08.12.2018 Appellant/InsuranceCompanyhasfiledan appealforreductionof
«.eawarddated14.10.2015.ThelearnedPO.MACT.Sakethaspassedan or an amount ofRs.16,15,776/- alongwith interest @9% per annum from the date offiling ofthe claim ofpetition till the date of realization.
The insurance company has deposited the entire award amount aong w,th upto date interest with the State BankofIndia,SaketCourt
Branch.
Partieshavenowamived intoanamicablesettlementinpre-sitting lokadalatanddetailofthesettlementisreproducedasunder.
Out ofaward amount so deposited by the Insurance company alongwith accrued intemst,the appellant/ Insurance company shall be entitledtoreceive/refundofalumpsumamountofRs.2,17,000/-andthe remaining amount lying deposited with the State Bank ofIndia, Saket
Court Branch alongwith the accrued interest shall be paid to the respondents/claimantsinthemannerasdirected bythelearnedTribunal.
2018:DHC:9288 > Appellant/Insurancecompanyshallalso be entitled to getarefund ofthestatutoiyamountRs.25,000/-alongwiththeinterest,ifany.
Accordingly,it is agreed outofthe award amountso deposited,a lump sum amount ofRs.2,17,000/- shall be refunded to the insurance company along with statutory deposit with interest,ifany. The balance amount lying with State Bank ofIndia, Saket Courts Branch shall be released in favour ofthe respondent/claimants, in terms ofthe award.
Since respondents No.l and 2 are old parents ofthe deceased hence liberty is granted tothem to approach the learned tribunal forrelease of theirshare,consideringtheiragefactor.
In view oftheabove,appealis disposed of.
■r Order dasti.
^1 (YOGESHKHANNA)
PRESIDING OFFICER
(K. VENKAtRAMAN)
DECEMBER 08,2018 CO-MEMBER VLD
P cfr v t• d3 (^^^5•;- ic
$-38 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MAC.APP.22/2016
THE NEW INDIA ASSURNCE CO LTD
Through;
CUKAM:
HON'BLEMR.JUSTICE YOGESHKHANNA MR.K.VENKATRAMAN,ADVOCATE,CO-MEMBER
08.12.2018 Appellant/InsuranceCompanyhasfiledan appealforreductionof
«.eawarddated14.10.2015.ThelearnedPO.MACT.Sakethaspassedan or an amount ofRs.16,15,776/- alongwith interest @9% per annum from the date offiling ofthe claim ofpetition till the date of realization.
The insurance company has deposited the entire award amount aong w,th upto date interest with the State BankofIndia,SaketCourt
Branch.
Partieshavenowamived intoanamicablesettlementinpre-sitting lokadalatanddetailofthesettlementisreproducedasunder.
Out ofaward amount so deposited by the Insurance company alongwith accrued intemst,the appellant/ Insurance company shall be entitledtoreceive/refundofalumpsumamountofRs.2,17,000/-andthe remaining amount lying deposited with the State Bank ofIndia, Saket
Court Branch alongwith the accrued interest shall be paid to the respondents/claimantsinthemannerasdirected bythelearnedTribunal.
2018:DHC:9288 > Appellant/Insurancecompanyshallalso be entitled to getarefund ofthestatutoiyamountRs.25,000/-alongwiththeinterest,ifany.
Accordingly,it is agreed outofthe award amountso deposited,a lump sum amount ofRs.2,17,000/- shall be refunded to the insurance company along with statutory deposit with interest,ifany. The balance amount lying with State Bank ofIndia, Saket Courts Branch shall be released in favour ofthe respondent/claimants, in terms ofthe award.
Since respondents No.l and 2 are old parents ofthe deceased hence liberty is granted tothem to approach the learned tribunal forrelease of theirshare,consideringtheiragefactor.
In view oftheabove,appealis disposed of.
■r Order dasti.
^1 (YOGESHKHANNA)
PRESIDING OFFICER
(K. VENKAtRAMAN)
DECEMBER 08,2018 CO-MEMBER VLD
P cfr v t• d3 (^^^5•;- ic
$-38 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MAC.APP.22/2016
THE NEW INDIA ASSURNCE CO LTD
Through;
VERSUS
RAMNARESH & ORS Appellant Respondents
Through: Mr.S. N.Parashar and Ms.Pankaj Kumari,Advs.
Through: Mr.S. N.Parashar and Ms.Pankaj Kumari,Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA
12.03.2019
12.03.2019
CM APPL.11600/2019
By the instant application,the claimants-respondents,in effeet, seek correction ofan inadvertent error which had crept in, when the parties settled the matter before Lok Adalat on 08.12.2018. The error pointed out is with regard to the statement ofthe amount lying with
State Bank ofIndia, Saket Court Branch instead ofUCO Bank,Delhi
High Court Branch.
Though, this is a subject of Lok Adalat, keeping in view the trifle nature ofthe subject matter,the correction sought, which isjust and proper,should be made by the Courtitself.
In view of the foregoing, it is directed that in the order dated
08.12.2018, where the reference is made with respect to release of balance amountlying with State Bank ofIndia,Saket CourtBranch,it
(1- be rea d as UCO B an k B ra n ch , Delhi High Court.
Th e ap p li c a ti on s t an d s disposed of.
�� · M A RCH 12 , 2019/kd A. K. CHAWLA, J
By the instant application,the claimants-respondents,in effeet, seek correction ofan inadvertent error which had crept in, when the parties settled the matter before Lok Adalat on 08.12.2018. The error pointed out is with regard to the statement ofthe amount lying with
State Bank ofIndia, Saket Court Branch instead ofUCO Bank,Delhi
High Court Branch.
Though, this is a subject of Lok Adalat, keeping in view the trifle nature ofthe subject matter,the correction sought, which isjust and proper,should be made by the Courtitself.
In view of the foregoing, it is directed that in the order dated
08.12.2018, where the reference is made with respect to release of balance amountlying with State Bank ofIndia,Saket CourtBranch,it
(1- be rea d as UCO B an k B ra n ch , Delhi High Court.
Th e ap p li c a ti on s t an d s disposed of.
�� · M A RCH 12 , 2019/kd A. K. CHAWLA, J
JUDGMENT