Madhu Manchanda and Anr v. M/S KRBL Limited

Delhi High Court · 14 Dec 2018 · 2018:DHC:7891
Vinod Goel
FAO 563/2018
2018:DHC:7891
civil appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to dispose of pending interlocutory injunction applications within four weeks, dismissing the appeal as not pressed.

Full Text
Translation output
F.A.O 563/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: 14.12.2018
FAO 563/2018
MRS. MADHU MANCHANDA AND ANR ..... Appellants
Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate and Ms.Sunanda Tulsyan and
Ms. Aarti, Advs.
VERSUS
M/S KRBL LIMITED ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate, Mr.S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman and Mr. Avi Bhandari, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
JUDGMENT

1. Notice. Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate, accepts the notice on behalf of the respondent.

2. After making some submissions, the learned counsel for the appellants does not press the appeal but submits that directions may be issued to the Trial Court to dispose of application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC filed by the respondent/plaintiff and their application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC. The next date of hearing before the Trial Court is 22.01.2019. 2018:DHC:7891 F.A.O 563/2018

3. Ex-parte injunction was granted by the trial court on 02.05.2016 against the appellant on the application of the respondent under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC. The application for vacation of stay under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC was filed by the Appellant on 19.05.2016. Both these applications are still not disposed of by the Trial Court.

4. In the circumstances, the appeal is disposed of with the directions to the Trial Court to hear arguments on both the applications on the next date and decide within a period of four weeks.