Mahesh Sood v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

Delhi High Court · 04 Dec 2018 · 2018:DHC:8481
Najmi Waziri
BAIL APPLN.2843/2018
2018:DHC:8481
criminal appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of petitioners who failed to join investigation as directed, holding that evasion of process disentitles them from bail.

Full Text
Translation output
;
$-52,58& 59 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN.2843/2018,CRL.M.A.48694/2018
MAHESH SOOD Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE(NCT OF DELHI) Respondent
BAIL APPLN.2851/2018,CRL.M.A.48735/2018
DEVENDER SOOD Petitioner
VERSUS
THE SIATE(NCT OF DELHI) Respondent BAIL APPLN,2856/2018,CRL.M.A.48753/2018
GAURAV SOOD Petitioner
VERSUS
THESTATE(NCT OF DELHI) Respondent
Through: Mr. Aman Khanna, Advocate for petitioners.
Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State with SI Kailash Chand,PS-R.K.Puram.
CORAM;
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
04.12.2018 The petitioners seek anticipatory bail. The learned Trial Court had directed them tojoin investigations on 26.09.2018 and 31.10.2018,however, they failed tojoin the investigations on both occasions.
The learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioners have
2018:DHC:8481 been evading the process oflaw.
In view ofthe above, no case is made out for granting anticipatory bail. Accordingly,the applications stand dismissed.
NAJMI WAZIRI,J DECEMBER 04,2018 RW 2018:DHC:8481
JUDGMENT