Brij Mohan Gupta v. Amrit Mohini

Delhi High Court · 05 Dec 2018 · 2018:DHC:7665
Vinod Goel
Tr.P. (C.) 158/2018
2018:DHC:7665
civil other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of one eviction petition to the court where another petition concerning the same property was pending to consolidate proceedings and ensure efficient disposal.

Full Text
Translation output
Tr.P. (C.) 158/2018 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: 05.12.2018
TR.P.(C.) 158/2018 & CM No. 33689/2018, 33692/2018 &
45579/2018 BRIJ MOHAN GUPTA & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Deepak Acharya, Advocate with Mr.Abhishek Aggarwal, Advocate.
VERSUS
AMRIT MOHINI & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.I.S. Alag, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Prachi V. Sharma, Mr.Jaitegan Singh, Mr.Kushagra Pandit and
Ms.Sanya Talwar, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
JUDGMENT

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that one Eviction Petition bearing No.6249/16 (old No.RC-51/11) titled as “Amrit Mohini & Another Vs. Brij Mohan Gupta & Others” is pending in the court of learned Additional Rent Controller („ARC‟), South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi, in respect of Shop No.20, Defence Colony Market, New Delhi-110024. He further submits that another petition No.25/17 titled as “Sunita Struck Vs. Brij Mohan Gupta & Ors.” in respect of the same property, is pending before the learned ARC, 2018:DHC:7665 Tr.P. (C.) 158/2018 South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi. He states that both the petitions are in respect of the same property and may be transferred to either of the courts.

2. Mr.I.S. Alag, learned senior counsel for the respondents, on instructions, has no objection to the same.

3. In the circumstances, the petition bearing RC No.25/17 titled as “Sunita Struck Vs. Brij Mohan Gupta & Ors.,” pending in the court of learned ARC, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi is withdrawn and assigned to the court of learned ARC, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi, for disposal in accordance with law.

4. The petition along with pending applications is disposed of. The interim order passed earlier stands vacated.

JUDGE DECEMBER 05, 2018 “shailendra”