Full Text
Translation output
$-66 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)889/2018
DHARAMVIR& ANR. Petitioners
Through: Mr.Sahil Sharma,Advocate
CONT.CAS(C)889/2018
DHARAMVIR& ANR. Petitioners
Through: Mr.Sahil Sharma,Advocate
VERSUS
THE STATE& ORS. Respondents
Through: Mr.Styakam,Addl.Standing Counselfor GNCTD with SI Madan Lai,PS
Dadri,Delhi
Through: Mr.Styakam,Addl.Standing Counselfor GNCTD with SI Madan Lai,PS
Dadri,Delhi
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
03.12.2018 Vide order of 24'^ September, 2018 respondent was directed to decide petitioner's Representation.
Learned Additional Standing Counsel for GNCTD has handed over a copy of Communication of 27'^ November, 2018, which is taken on record. According to it, complainant's version is found to be more authentic.Petitioner is an accused in FIR case in question.
Be that as it may. Since compliance of order of 24^*^ November, 2018 has been made in substance,therefore,this petition is disposed ofas infructuous. _
SUNIL GAUR,J DECEMBER 03,2018 r 2018:DHC:9353
03.12.2018 Vide order of 24'^ September, 2018 respondent was directed to decide petitioner's Representation.
Learned Additional Standing Counsel for GNCTD has handed over a copy of Communication of 27'^ November, 2018, which is taken on record. According to it, complainant's version is found to be more authentic.Petitioner is an accused in FIR case in question.
Be that as it may. Since compliance of order of 24^*^ November, 2018 has been made in substance,therefore,this petition is disposed ofas infructuous. _
SUNIL GAUR,J DECEMBER 03,2018 r 2018:DHC:9353
JUDGMENT