NILESH MANSUKHLAL PATEL v. MUKESH MANSUKHLAL KOHTARI

Supreme Court of India · 20 Nov 2018
KURIAN JOSEPH; DEEPAK GUPTA; HEMANT GUPTA
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3326 OF 2016
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Supreme Court disposed of civil appeals by recording the parties' settlement and modifying the impugned High Court order accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3326 OF 2016
NILESH MANSUKHLAL PATEL & ANR. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
MUKESH MANSUKHLAL KOHTARI & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3327 OF 2016
JUDGMENT
KURIAN, J.

1. The appellants are before this Court, aggrieved by the order dated 07.08.2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay in Notice of Motion(Lodging) No. 2371/2012 in Criminal Contempt Petition No. 2 of 2011 in Arbitration Petition NO. 315 of 2003.

2. We are happy that during the pendency of the appeals before this Court, the parties have settled their disputes. The Consent Terms (in original) dated 02.11.2018, duly signed by the parties and their respective counsel, have been handed over to us. The same is taken on record. The consent terms shall form part of the decree.

3. The impugned order shall stand modified accordingly.

4. The appeals are disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms dated 02.11.2018 ........................ J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] [ DEEPAK GUPTA ] [ HEMANT GUPTA ] New Delhi; November 20, 2018.