Bhawna Arora v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 08 Sep 2025 · 2025:DHC:7851-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla
W.P.(C) 13506/2025
2025:DHC:7851-DB
constitutional appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioner to continue residing in Delhi temporarily and directed the respondents to pass a reasoned order treating the writ petition as a representation within four weeks.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 13506/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 13506/2025 & CM APPL. 55440/2025
BHAWNA ARORA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Ishita Pandey, Adv
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Seema Gulati, SPC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER(ORAL)
08.09.2025
JUDGMENT

1. Learned Counsel for the parties are ad idem that this writ petition may be disposed of by presently permitting the petitioner to continue at Delhi till 28 November 2025, with the direction to the respondents to pass a reasoned and speaking order, treating this writ petition as a representation.

2. Accordingly, let the order in those terms be passed by the respondents within four weeks from today.

3. We make it clear that, however, the entitlement of the petitioner to continue at Delhi is only till 28 November 2025. Any further continuance would be subject to the outcome of the order to be passed by the respondents. W.P.(C) 13506/2025

4. Needless to say, should the petitioner be aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, the petitioner’s right in that regard would remain reserved.

5. This writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J SEPTEMBER 8, 2025