Full Text
Translation output
J ^2 3 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN.2863/2018
ANISHKUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kumar Mukesh and Mr. S.
Kumar,Advs.
BAIL APPLN.2863/2018
ANISHKUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kumar Mukesh and Mr. S.
Kumar,Advs.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through: Mr.AmitChadha,APP for State AND
Through: Mr.AmitChadha,APP for State AND
BAIL APPLN.2876/2018
PANKAJ KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kumar Mukesh and Mi'. S.
Kumar,Advs.
PANKAJ KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kumar Mukesh and Mi'. S.
Kumar,Advs.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through: Mr.Amit Chadha,APP for State.
Through: Mr.Amit Chadha,APP for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.PATHAK
11.01.2019 As per the FIR, petitioners are brothers of complainant. During the engagement ceremony of their youngest brother Anish on 07.07.2018 a quarrel ensued between the family members. Complainant has alleged that petitioners and co-accused Abhishek,Happy,Praveen, Ashwani and others gave beatings to him and his parents-in-law and two brothers-in-law.
Complainant's father-in-law, namely,Budh Singh died in the hospital after six days of the incident. The allegations are that beatings were given by danda and bricks. It is prayed that petitioners may be admitted to bail.
2019:DHC:7349 M p.
Learned APP submits that initially FIR was registered under Sections
323/341/34 IPG. However, subsequently, offences under Sections
308/304/354A/354B/376 were also added. The wife of complainant, namely,Lalita, in her complaint to Delhi Commission for Women(DCW), had stated that she was raped by her in-laws. It is submitted that offences are serious in nature,therefore,petitioners are notentitled to bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no allegation ofrape are there in the FIR,registered on 08.07.2018, as well as in the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.ofLalita recorded on 21.08.2018.
Keeping in mind the totality of the facts and circumstances of this case, petitioners are admitted to bail subject to their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of?25,000/- each with one surety each in the like amountto the satisfaction ofthe trial court.
Both the above-noted bail applications are disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
A.K.PATHAK,J.
JANUARY 11,2019 ga 2019:DHC:7349
11.01.2019 As per the FIR, petitioners are brothers of complainant. During the engagement ceremony of their youngest brother Anish on 07.07.2018 a quarrel ensued between the family members. Complainant has alleged that petitioners and co-accused Abhishek,Happy,Praveen, Ashwani and others gave beatings to him and his parents-in-law and two brothers-in-law.
Complainant's father-in-law, namely,Budh Singh died in the hospital after six days of the incident. The allegations are that beatings were given by danda and bricks. It is prayed that petitioners may be admitted to bail.
2019:DHC:7349 M p.
Learned APP submits that initially FIR was registered under Sections
323/341/34 IPG. However, subsequently, offences under Sections
308/304/354A/354B/376 were also added. The wife of complainant, namely,Lalita, in her complaint to Delhi Commission for Women(DCW), had stated that she was raped by her in-laws. It is submitted that offences are serious in nature,therefore,petitioners are notentitled to bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no allegation ofrape are there in the FIR,registered on 08.07.2018, as well as in the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.ofLalita recorded on 21.08.2018.
Keeping in mind the totality of the facts and circumstances of this case, petitioners are admitted to bail subject to their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of?25,000/- each with one surety each in the like amountto the satisfaction ofthe trial court.
Both the above-noted bail applications are disposed of in the above terms.
Dasti.
A.K.PATHAK,J.
JANUARY 11,2019 ga 2019:DHC:7349
JUDGMENT