Full Text
Translation output
$-10,11, 12 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C.2448/2016 and Crl. MA 10495/2016
MANMOHAN RAJ BINDRA Petitioner
Through:Mr.D.S.Vohra,proxy counselfor Mr. Chirag Jamwal,Advocate
CRL.M.C.2448/2016 and Crl. MA 10495/2016
MANMOHAN RAJ BINDRA Petitioner
Through:Mr.D.S.Vohra,proxy counselfor Mr. Chirag Jamwal,Advocate
VERSUS
STATE(GOVT.OF NOT)OF DELHI& ORS Respondents
Through:Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja,AFP for State Mr.Ghanshyam Sharma,Adv.for R-2to 4
Mr.Arshdeep Singh,Adv.for R-5
Through:Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja,AFP for State Mr.Ghanshyam Sharma,Adv.for R-2to 4
Mr.Arshdeep Singh,Adv.for R-5
CRL.M.C.706/2018 and Crl. M.A.2528-2529/2018
Through:Mr.D.S.Vohra,proxy counsel for Mr.
Through:Mr.D.S.Vohra,proxy counsel for Mr.
VERSUS
THE STATE GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents
Through:Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal,APP for State Mr.Arshdeep Singh,Adv.for R-2
Through:Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal,APP for State Mr.Arshdeep Singh,Adv.for R-2
CRL.M.C.707/2018 and Crl. M.A.2530-2531/2018
Through:Mr.D.S.Vohra,proxy counsel for Mr.
Through:Mr.D.S.Vohra,proxy counsel for Mr.
VERSUS
THE STATE(GOVT OF NOT)OF DELHI & ORS Respondents
Through:Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal,APP for State
Through:Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal,APP for State
CRL.M.C.2448/2016&conn. page 1 of2
2019:DHC:7625
2019:DHC:7625
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
14.01.2019 These three petitions arise out of proceedings in criminal complaint case (no.619347/2016) of the petitioner. While these petitions have been pending against earlier orders of the court of
Magistrate and the court ofrevision,the criminal complaint has been dismissed by the Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 26.02.2018.
A copy ofthe said order has been placed on record by the respondents in Crl. MC 707/2018.
On being asked, the counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly concedes that to be the result of the criminal complaint. The said decision on the criminal complaint by the Metropolitan Magistrate renders the petitions against the earlier orders infructuous. The petitions and the applications filed ^lere^ith are dismissed accordingly.
R.K.GAUBA,J JANUARY 14,2019 yg
14.01.2019 These three petitions arise out of proceedings in criminal complaint case (no.619347/2016) of the petitioner. While these petitions have been pending against earlier orders of the court of
Magistrate and the court ofrevision,the criminal complaint has been dismissed by the Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 26.02.2018.
A copy ofthe said order has been placed on record by the respondents in Crl. MC 707/2018.
On being asked, the counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly concedes that to be the result of the criminal complaint. The said decision on the criminal complaint by the Metropolitan Magistrate renders the petitions against the earlier orders infructuous. The petitions and the applications filed ^lere^ith are dismissed accordingly.
R.K.GAUBA,J JANUARY 14,2019 yg
CRL.M.C.2448/2016&conn. page2of2
2019:DHC:7625
2019:DHC:7625
JUDGMENT