Narendra Plastic Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 16 Jan 2019 · 2019:DHC:7938-DB
Sanjiv Khanna; Anup Jai Ram Bhambhani
W.P.(C) No. 10938/2018
2019:DHC:7938-DB
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions and treated them as representations to the respondents for prompt examination and response, with liberty to revive the petitions if necessary.

Full Text
Translation output
J
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) No. 10938/2018 & CM APPL. Nos. 42615/2018, 42616/2018
NARENDRA PLASTIC PRIVATE LIMITED '
Through: Mr. Pratyushprava Saha & Mr. Abhishek A. Rastogi, Advs.
Petitioner
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Through; ......Respondent Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla,CGSC with Mr. Kamaldecp, Adv. for R-
1/UOI.
Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Sr. Standing counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, Advs.
W.P.(C) No. 10998/2018 & CM APPL. Nos. 42813/2018, 42814/2018
COSMO FILMS LIMITED Petitioner
Through; Mr. Pratyushprava Saha & Mr. Abhishek A. Rastogi, Advs.
VERSUS
....Respondent Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Sr. Standing counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, Advs.
Mr. Amit Bansal & Ms. Titasha Banerjee, Advs. for R2 & 3.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIiiAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R
16.01.2019 After some hearing learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition and states that the petition may be treated as
2019:DHC:7938-DB representation to the respondent, who should examine and responds within shortest time.
We take the statement on record and dispose of the writ petition with the observation that the same would be treated as a representation to the respondent, who would examine the same as soon as possible. It will be open for the counsel for the petitioner to file an application for revival ofthe present petition, ifnecessary and so advised.
SANJIV KHANNA, J ANIJP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J - JANUARY 16, 2019/w/
2019:DHC:7938-DB
JUDGMENT