Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 4938/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: January 31, 2019
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: January 31, 2019
CRL.M.C. 4938/2018 & CRL.M.A.33043/2018
VARUN PASRICHA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Ms. Rosemary Raju, Ms. Aishwarya and
Ms. Upasna Goel, Advocates
VARUN PASRICHA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Ms. Rosemary Raju, Ms. Aishwarya and
Ms. Upasna Goel, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent
Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Bharat Singh
Mr. Vivek Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate for complainant
Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Bharat Singh
Mr. Vivek Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate for complainant
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R (ORAL)
CRL.M.A. 33042/2018 (Exemption)
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 4938/2018 & CRL.M.A.33043/2018
In this petition, petitioner is seeking quashing of order of 7th July, 2018, vide which non-bailable warrants have been issued against him.
Petitioner is also seeking quashing of order of 4th August, 2018, vide which the process for proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. has been issued against him.
With the intervention of learned counsel for the parties, the subject matter of this petition has been compromised in terms of Compromise
2019:DHC:661
In this petition, petitioner is seeking quashing of order of 7th July, 2018, vide which non-bailable warrants have been issued against him.
Petitioner is also seeking quashing of order of 4th August, 2018, vide which the process for proclamation under Section 82 of Cr.P.C. has been issued against him.
With the intervention of learned counsel for the parties, the subject matter of this petition has been compromised in terms of Compromise
2019:DHC:661
CRL.M.C. 4938/2018
Deed of 23rd January, 2019, a copy of which has been placed on record by learned counsel for petitioner.
Learned senior counsel appears on behalf of complainant and submits that in terms of aforesaid Compromise Deed of 23rd January, 2019, the first instalment has been paid and the second instalment is payable in March 2019 and the third and final instalment is payable in
May, 2019 and post dated cheques for the entire settlement amount have been given to complainant of this FIR.
In view of the aforesaid, impugned orders of 7th July, 2018 and 4th August, 2018 are quashed with the rider that if petitioner violates the
Compromise Deed of 23rd January, 2019 entered between the parties, then the State/complainant will be at liberty to get this order revoked.
This petition and application are accordingly disposed of.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
JANUARY 31, 2019 v 2019:DHC:661
Deed of 23rd January, 2019, a copy of which has been placed on record by learned counsel for petitioner.
Learned senior counsel appears on behalf of complainant and submits that in terms of aforesaid Compromise Deed of 23rd January, 2019, the first instalment has been paid and the second instalment is payable in March 2019 and the third and final instalment is payable in
May, 2019 and post dated cheques for the entire settlement amount have been given to complainant of this FIR.
In view of the aforesaid, impugned orders of 7th July, 2018 and 4th August, 2018 are quashed with the rider that if petitioner violates the
Compromise Deed of 23rd January, 2019 entered between the parties, then the State/complainant will be at liberty to get this order revoked.
This petition and application are accordingly disposed of.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
JANUARY 31, 2019 v 2019:DHC:661
JUDGMENT