Anita Singhvi v. Rajan Rao

Delhi High Court · 31 Jan 2019 · 2019:DHC:650
Vinod Goel
Cont. Cas (C) No.26/2019
2019:DHC:650
civil other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition after the parties amicably settled the possession dispute with the respondent undertaking to hand over possession by a new date and providing security for use and occupation charges.

Full Text
Translation output
Cont. Cas (C )No.26/2019 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: 31.01.2019 Cont. Cas. (C) No.26/2019
ANITA SINGHVI ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Sanjiv Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bharat Garg, Advocate.
VERSUS
RAJAN RAO ....Respondent
Through: Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate with respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
JUDGMENT

1. It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sumit Choudhary, learned counsel for the respondent that the matter has been amicably resolved and settled between the parties.

2. The respondent, present in person, states that he could not handover the vacant physical possession of the subject premises on or before 31.12.2018 in terms of the order dated 07.09.2018 passed by this court and in terms of his undertaking dated 14.09.2018 given in RFA No.756/2018.

3. It is agreed between the parties that the contemnor/respondent shall handover the vacant physical possession of the subject premises to the petitioner on or before 31.03.2019. The respondent has handed 2019:DHC:650 Cont. Cas (C )No.26/2019 over two post-dated cheques in the sum of Rs.15 lacs each in favour of the petitioner to the learned senior counsel for the petitioner towards use and occupation charges till March, 2019. He undertakes that the cheques would be honoured on presentation. He tenders his unconditional apology for not honouring his undertaking dated 14.09.2018 which, in the circumstances, is accepted with caution to be careful in future. The respondent has placed on record his undertaking in the form of an affidavit which is taken on record. The undertaking so furnished by the respondent is accepted.

4. In the circumstances, nothing survives in the petition which is disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE JANUARY 31, 2019 ‘AA’