Col Anand Swaroop v. General Bipin Rawat & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 19 Feb 2019 · 2019:DHC:1154
Vinod Goel
Cont. Cas. (C) No.126/2019
2019:DHC:1154
military_law petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the confirming authority of a General Court Martial, clarifying that the competent authority is the GOC-in-C Western Command under Army Regulations and allowed the petitioner to seek other remedies.

Full Text
Translation output
Cont. Cas. (C) No.126/2019 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: 19.02.2019
CONT.CAS(C) 126/2019
COL ANAND SWAROOP ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.S. Pandey, Ms. Devina Sharma, Ms. Vibhuti Sharma, Advs.
VERSUS
GENERAL BIPIN RAWAT & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Col. V.S. Gaur and Major
Charul Bhat in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
JUDGMENT

1. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, the Central Government Standing Counsel, on instructions, has placed on record a copy of message received from JAG Branch, Headquarter Western Command to the effect that β€œit is clarified as under ALFA (.) confirming authority of the petitioner is GOC-IN-C western command in terms of Para 472 of Regulation for the Army COMMA 1987 (Revised Edition) BRAVO (.) GCM proceedings were placed before GOC Delhi Area for consideration of revision of findings of GCM. GCM proceedings were placed before GOC Delhi area for consideration of revision of findings 2019:DHC:1154 Cont. Cas.

(C) No.126/2019 of GCM. GCM proceedings not repeat not yet been submitted to GOC-in-C western command till date.”

2. The learned CGSC states that the General Officer Commanding, Delhi Area, Delhi Cantt is not the confirming authority of the petitioner. He further states that the confirming Authority of the petitioner is General Officer Commanding-in- Chief, Western Command, Chandimandir (Haryana) in terms of Regulation 472 of the Regulation of the Army, 1987.

3. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail other remedies as available in law.

4. As such, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.

5. Order dasti under the signature of Court Master/Private Secretary.