Varun Rai v. State & Anr

Delhi High Court · 22 Feb 2019 · 2019:DHC:7449
R. K. Gauba
CRL.M.C.3938/2016
2019:DHC:7449
criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners to withdraw their criminal petitions at the pre-summoning inquiry stage with liberty to raise their contentions later if needed.

Full Text
Translation output
'D
$-3 &4 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C.3938/2016 & Crl.M.A. 16527/2016
VARUN RAI Petitioner
Through; Mr.N.Hariharan,Sr. Adv.with Mr.Rohan Jaitley,Ms.Bhumika Kapoor, Mr.Aditya Vaibhav Singh,Mr.Prateek
Bhalla,Mr.Sharan Dhalla,Ms.Mallika Chaddha& Mr.Govind,Advs.
VERSUS
STATE& ANR Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal,APP for the State.
Ms.Saroj Bidawat,Adv.for R-2.
CRL.M.C.4402/2016 & Crl.M.A. 18381/2016
VINAY RAI Petitioner
Through: Mr.Shakeel Ahmed & Mr.Yogesh Kr.
Sharma,Advs.
VERSUS
STATE 8c ANR Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal,APP for the State.
Mr.Prsanta Verma,SCGC for R-2.
.CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
22.02.2019 Ajfter some hearing,the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that since the case before the Metropolitan Magistrate is still at the stage of pre-summoning inquiry, the petitioners seek permission to withdraw these petitions reserving their contentions set out herein to be agitated for appropriate remedy to be pursued in case adverse order is passed in such inquiry.
The petitions and the applications filed therewitharedismi^s^^ withdrawn.
FEBRUARY 22,2019/nk 2019:DHC:7449
JUDGMENT