Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 2830/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: February 05, 2019
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: February 05, 2019
CRL.M.C. 2830/2018 & CRL.M.A. 10039/2018
HARISH CHANDRA JOSHI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vishalakshi Singh, Advocate
HARISH CHANDRA JOSHI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vishalakshi Singh, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State SI Chetan Mandia Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for
Official Liquidator
Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-
State SI Chetan Mandia Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for
Official Liquidator
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R (ORAL)
Quashing of FIR No. 162/2009, under Sections 193/196/197/198/421/468/120B of IPC, registered at P.S.: Economic
Offences Wing, Delhi is sought on merits in this petition.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the charge-sheet in the case has been filed.
Learned counsel for petitioner relies upon orders of 3rd May, 2018 (Annexure-A) in CO.PET. 418/1998 titled In the matter of M/s Vinkas
General Carbon Ltd. and of 4th February, 2013 in CRL.M.C. 3627/2012 titled Sushil Singhla & Anr. vs. State & Anr. to seek quashing of FIR in question. Since charge-sheet has been filed therefore, this Court is not inclined to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C
2019:DHC:769
Quashing of FIR No. 162/2009, under Sections 193/196/197/198/421/468/120B of IPC, registered at P.S.: Economic
Offences Wing, Delhi is sought on merits in this petition.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the charge-sheet in the case has been filed.
Learned counsel for petitioner relies upon orders of 3rd May, 2018 (Annexure-A) in CO.PET. 418/1998 titled In the matter of M/s Vinkas
General Carbon Ltd. and of 4th February, 2013 in CRL.M.C. 3627/2012 titled Sushil Singhla & Anr. vs. State & Anr. to seek quashing of FIR in question. Since charge-sheet has been filed therefore, this Court is not inclined to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C
2019:DHC:769
CRL.M.C. 2830/2018 for quashing of FIR as petitioner has efficacious remedy to urge the pleas taken herein before the trial court at the stage of hearing on the point of charge.
Accordingly, this petition and the application are disposed of, while relegating the petitioners to raise the pleas taken herein before the trial court at the stage of hearing on the point of charge.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
FEBRUARY 05, 2019 v 2019:DHC:769
Accordingly, this petition and the application are disposed of, while relegating the petitioners to raise the pleas taken herein before the trial court at the stage of hearing on the point of charge.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
FEBRUARY 05, 2019 v 2019:DHC:769
JUDGMENT