Birvati & Ors. v. D.D.A.

Delhi High Court · 15 Mar 2019 · 2019:DHC:7787
C. Harishankar
W.P.(C)13370/2005
2019:DHC:7787
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions against the DDA for default and non-prosecution due to petitioners' repeated failure to appear.

Full Text
Translation output
. t f $-32& 33 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dateofdecision:15"'March,2019
W.P.(C)13370/2005
BIRVATI& ORS.
Through: None Petitioners
VERSUS
D.D.A. . Respondent
Through:/ Dhanesh Relan,SC-DDA ;: r/.jiWith.M^ Rajeev Jha and Ms. ^ Gauri Ghaturvedi,Advs.
V.'!' ^
• . •/,V, W.P.(C)7442/2011
SHRI RAMA BAS PANDEY " y- l*
PL. 10880/2014
Petitioner DELHIDEVELO^MD^y^
AND ORS. ■ ^ b Respondents
Through: Mr.Dhanesh Relan,SC-DDA with Mr.Rajeev Jha and Ms. Gauri Ghaturvedi,Advs.
Mr.Prasun Kumar,Adv.for R-5
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.HARISHANKAR
ORDER(ORAL)
15.03.2019
WP(C)13370/2005 &7442/2011 Page 1 of2
2019:DHC:7787
JUDGMENT

1. Despite the matters having been called out twice, there is no appearance on behalfofthe petitioners. There was no appearance on behalfofthepetitioners on the lastfour datesofhearing either.

2. In the circumstances,the writ petitions are dismissed for default and non-prosecution.

MARCH 15,2019/ib -, C.HA' - - f ''I ' ■i t-'.'J'i • ""r ^ ■ Wfi -n hi ■■ /.. /■ «-i '''•■i' B, W. r * SHA^KAR, J