Through: v. Through:

Delhi High Court · 26 Mar 2019
Chander Shekhar
criminal appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court directed the Trial Court to decide the petitioners' anticipatory bail applications on merits without delay, dismissing the High Court applications as withdrawn.

Full Text
Translation output
$-56 & 57 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN.724/2019,CRL.M.(BAIL)519/2019&
CRL.M.A.6021/2019
SlMMl JAIN Petitioner STATE
Through:
VERSUS
Through:
Mr.Tanmay Mehta,Mr.Vineet Chadha and Mr.Ajay Kumar, Advs.
Respondent Mr.Ashish Dutta,APP with SI Vijay Kumar,PS Burari,Delhi
BAIL APPLN.731/2019,CRL.M.(BAIL)521/2019&
CRL.M.A.6050/2019
NARESH JAIN Petitio STATE
Through:
VERSUS
Through: ner Mr.Tanmay Mehta,Mr.Vineet Chadha and Mr.Ajay Kumar, Advs.
Respondent Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP with SI Vijay Kumar,PS Burari,Delhi
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
26.03.2019
ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the Trial Courtis notdisposing ofthe applicationsfiled bythe petitioners under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) on merits and simply adjourning the matter on the ground that two other 2019:DHC:7369 matters are pending before the High Court. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that his only grievance is that the Trial Court should consider and dispose ofthe applications ofthe petitioners on merits.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after some arguments, further submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the anticipatory bail applications with a direction to the Trial Court to consider and dispose ofthe applications ofthe petitioners under Section 438 ofthe Cr.P.C.on merits without waiting for the outcome ofthe two petitions pending before the High Court. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to the Trial Court to consider and dispose of the applications of the petitioners under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. pending before it on merits, at the earliest. chande£^khar,j