Full Text
Translation output
\ $-62to 64 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.fCI2914/2019.C M.APPL.13511/2D19
—W.P.(CI2915/2019.C.M.APPL.13513/2019
W.P.tCl2917/2019.C.M.APPL.13516/2019 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX - 8
Petitioner
—W.P.(CI2915/2019.C.M.APPL.13513/2019
W.P.tCl2917/2019.C.M.APPL.13516/2019 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX - 8
Petitioner
VERSUS
M/S.SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICSPVT.LTD Respondent
Through : Sh. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel.
Sh. SachitJolly and Sh. Arush Bhatia, Advocates, forresponderit,in Item Nos.62to64.
Through : Sh. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel.
Sh. SachitJolly and Sh. Arush Bhatia, Advocates, forresponderit,in Item Nos.62to64.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEPRATEEK JALAN
26.03.2019 The Revenue argues in these petitions that the ITAT could not have extended the interim order beyond the period of 365 days, prescribed by Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This issue is now covered by thejudgment ofthis Court in Pepsico Foods
Pvt. Ltd. V. ylC/r 376 ITR 87. The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed along with the pending applications. , S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J
PRATEEK JALAN,J MARCH 26,2019/ajk 2019:DHC:7906-DB
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEPRATEEK JALAN
26.03.2019 The Revenue argues in these petitions that the ITAT could not have extended the interim order beyond the period of 365 days, prescribed by Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This issue is now covered by thejudgment ofthis Court in Pepsico Foods
Pvt. Ltd. V. ylC/r 376 ITR 87. The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed along with the pending applications. , S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J
PRATEEK JALAN,J MARCH 26,2019/ajk 2019:DHC:7906-DB
JUDGMENT