Full Text
W.P.(C)5319/2018& CM APPL.20634/2018.35596/2018
M/S BEGRAJ VEDPAL Petitioner
Through Mr Manohar Malik,Advocate.
Through Mrs Avnish Ahlawat,Standing Counsel DAMB with Mr Nitesh Kumar Singh,Advocate for respondents.
22.
W.P.(0 5320/2018& CM No.20636/2018 M/S BISHT FLOWERS Petitioner
24.
W.P.(C^ 5324/2018 & CM No.20647/2018 SANGEETA CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner
25.
MOHMMAD JAMIL Petitioner
SH.RAKESH JAISWAL Petitioner
SH.K.N.SHARMA Petitioner
PRADEEP NAINWAL Petitioner
SH.NARESH KUMAR Petitioner
Through Mr Manohar Malik,Advocate,
04.04.2019
ORDER
1. The petitioners are traders engaged in the whole sale trade offlowers and are licence holders of B-Category Licence for operating in the Flower Trade Centre located at Ghazipur. The prayers made in the petitions are similarly worded and read as under "(a) issue a writ ofcertiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash and set aside the Resolution NO. 367/2016 dated 23.02.2016 and Allotment/Shifting Letters dated 31.05.2016 issued by the Respondent No.2 in favour ofsome selective traders having Shops Nos.B-2to B-11; (b) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent No. 1 Board not to proceed with any further actions pursuantto the aforesaid impugned reallotment/shifting letters dated 31.05.2016;
(c) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction against the Respondents to pass a speaking order within a period as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court based on a fair, transparent, uniform and unbiased procedure to shift/relocate the traders including the Petitioner from their present disadvantageous location to a better location preferably near the market gate ofthe Flower Market,Gazipur,Delhi;"
2. Insofar as prayer(a)is concerned-that is,regarding the petitioners' challenge to the resolution dated 23.02.2016 and allotment letters dated 31.05.2016 issued to the traders having shop Nos.B-2to B-11-the leamed counsel appearing forthe petitioners states thatthe petitioners do not wish to press the said prayer. He flirthef states that a representation for allotment of alternate sites {Phars) would be made to the concerned Flower Market Committee and the petitioners would be satisfied if the Flower Market Committee is directed to considerthe said representation(s).
3. This is agreeable to the respondents.
4. In view ofthe consensus between the counselfor both the parties,the petitioners are permitted to make representation(s)to the respondents.In the event,the petitioners make representation within aperiod oftwo weeksfrom today,the concerned Flower Market Committee shall consider the same and pass a speaking order as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period ofeight weeks thereafter.
5. The petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. All pending applications stand disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU,J APRIL 04,2019 pkv