Sushila Goel v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 15 Apr 2019 · 2019:DHC:7878-DB
S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta
W.P.(C)11870/2018
2019:DHC:7878-DB
property petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the Land Acquisition Collector to consider the petitioners' compensation claims under Sections 30 and 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and pass reasoned orders within a specified timeframe.

Full Text
Translation output
w $-24to 28 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C)11870/2018
SMT.SUSHILA GGEL& ORS Petitiofiers
Through: Mr.R.S.Rana,Advocate,
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondents
Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate with Ms. Shilphi Chaudhary,Advocate. "
Mr. Faiman Ali, Advocate with Mr. Akash Mohan,Advocatefor R-2.
W.P.(C)11872/2018
SMT. SUSHILA GOEL AND ORS. Petitioners
Through: Mr.R.S.Rana,Advocate.
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .;... Respondents
Through: Mr.YeeshuJain,Advocate with Ms. Shilphi Chaudhary,Advocate.
Mr. Farman Ali, Advocate with Mr. Akash Mohan,Advocate for R-2.
W.P.(C)11874/2018
O SMT. SUSHILAGpELAND ORS. Petitioners
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents
Akash Mohan,Advocatefor R-2- 2019:DHC:7878-DB
J- : W.P.(C)11889/2018 : SMT.StrSHILAGOEL AND ORS. .....Petitioners
VERSUS
, GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ;....,Resporidefits
Mr. Farman Ali, Advocate with Mr,.
Akash Mohan,Advocate for R-2.
W.P.(C)11992/2018
SMT.SUSHILA GOEL AND ORS. ..... Petitipnefs
VERSUS
GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. Respohdents
Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain,Advpcate with Ms. Akash Mohan,AdvoPate for R-2.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MIJRALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA
15.04.2019
ORDER

1. These petitipns are being disposed ofby a common order,hpwever,they have been heard separately. The short prayers in the present petitions is for directions to the Land Acquisition Collector (West) to epnsider the past orders pn the applications/representations made by the Petitioners seeking a reference for proper adjudication of their claims for cpnipensatioh by making a reference to the Court of the Additional District Judge('ADJ') under SeetiPns 30 and 31 ofthe Land AcquisitiPn Act,1894. -» V /

2. The copies of the representations are enclosed with each of the writ petitions as Annexure P-1. On 22""^ January 2019,the Court permitted the Petitioners to file the corrected copies of Annexure R-2. Counsel for the Petitioners,states that he would be filing the corrected copies of Annexure R-2i.e.the copy ofthe Award,duringthe course ofthe day.

3. Counselforthe Respondentsseeks moretimefor instructions.

4. Considering that the reliefsought is a limited one,the Court directs the Respondents to treat the copies of the representations/applications (which.have been placed as Annexure P-1 with each of the writ petitions) as a representation madeto the LAC.TheLAC will,after hearing the Petitioners, pass appropriate orders thereon, not later than 31®^ July 2019. The dates of hearing should be intimated to thePetitioners atleastten days in advance.

5. the reasoned orders on the applications of the Petitioners will be communicated tothem notlaterthan IS^''August2019.It willbe opentothe Petitioners, if aggrieved by such orders to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

6. Thepetitions are disposed ofwiththe aforesaid directions^ S.MURALIDHAR,J. I.S. MEHTA,J. APRIL 15,2019/«J i