Atul Bansal v. State; Sona Bansal v. State

Delhi High Court · 22 Apr 2019 · 2019:DHC:7351
Mukta Gupta
BAIL APPLN.2987/2018 and BAIL APPLN.3002/2018
2019:DHC:7351
criminal petition_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed as withdrawn the anticipatory bail applications filed by Atul Bansal and Sona Bansal in a criminal case under Sections 409, 420, and 120B IPC.

Full Text
Translation output
/(9 $-46-47 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN.2987/2018
ATUL BANSAL
Represented by:
STATE
VERSUS
BAIL APPLN.3002/2018
SONA BANSAL
Petitioner Mr.Harsh Sethi,Mr.Sermon Rawat, Mr.Parikshit Goyal,Advs.
Respondent Mr.Rahul Mehra,Standing Counsel with Mr.Sanjay Lao,ASC with Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with Insp.
Ramesh Kr.Singh PS ROW Mandir Marg.
Mr.A.P.Dubey,Adv.for complainant.
Petitioner Mr.Harsh Sethi,Mr.Sermon Rawat, Mr.Parikshit Goyal,Advs.
VERSUS
STATE
Respondent Mr.Rahul Mehra,Standing Counsel with Mr.Sanjay Lao,ASC with Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with Insp.
Ramesh Kr.Singh PS EOW Mandir Marg.
Mr.A.P.Dubey,Adv.for complainant.
BAIL APPLN.2987/2018 andBAIL APPLN.3002/2018 page1 of2
2019:DHC:7351
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
22.04.2019 By these petitions petitioners have sought anticipatory bail in case
FIR No. 165/2016 under Sections 409/420/120B IPG.
At the outset learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petitions.
Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA,J.
APRIL 22,2019 'ga' BAILAPPLN.2987/2018andBAILAPPLN.3002/2018 page2of2
2019:DHC:7351
JUDGMENT