Anil Verma v. R.K. Jewellers SK Group & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 09 May 2019 · 2019:DHC:2276
Prathiba M. Singh
CS (COMM) 1097/2018
2019:DHC:2557
civil other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of applications for condonation of delay as infructuous since replies were considered and allowed correction of judgment to reflect appearances, listing the matter for further hearing.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS (COMM) 1097/2018
ANIL VERMA ..... Plaintiff
Through: None.
VERSUS
R.K. JEWELLERS SK GROUP & ORS. ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Munish Mehra and Ms. Narayani Prakash, Advocates for D-1, 2 & 3.
(M:7379852409)
Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate for Delhi Police with IO Pravin Kumar, DIU-Dwarka. (M:9810158581)
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R 09.05.2019
I.A. 6784-85/2019 (delay in filing reply)
JUDGMENT

1. These I.A.s pray for condonation of delay in filing the replies to the contempt application. The replies have already been considered in the judgment dated 25th April, 2019 and have been taken on record.

2. I.As. are, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. I.A. 6783/2019 (correction in judgment)

3. The appearance of Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, ld. counsel appearing for the Investigating Officer along with that of the Investigating Officer, Mr. Pravin Kumar, as appearing in the order dated 10th April, 2019 may be reflected in the judgment dated 25th April, 2019.

4. I.A. is disposed of, accordingly. CS (COMM) 1097/2018

5. List on the date already fixed i.e. 20th May, 2019. 2019:DHC:2557

6. Corrigendum be uploaded.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. MAY 09, 2019