Lalita v. The State

Delhi High Court · 22 May 2019 · 2019:DHC:7307
R. K. Gauba
BAIL APPLN.1303/2019
2019:DHC:7307
criminal other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of bail petitions filed with deficient pleadings, granting liberty to file fresh applications, noting one petitioner was more a victim than an assailant.

Full Text
Translation output
© N ¥ HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN.1303/2019 and Crl.M.A.11046/2019
LALITA Petitioner
Through: Mr.Davinder Kumar,Advocate
VERSUS
THESTATE Respondent
Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja,APP for the State with SI Madan Mohan,PS
Ranhoia.
BAIL APPLN.1306/2019 and Crl.M.A.11058/2019
LAXMlDEVI Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE Respondent
Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja,APP for the Ranhoia.
BAIL APPLN. 1307/2019 and Crl.M.A.11059/2019
RAM BABU Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE Respondent
Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja,APP forthe Ranhoia.
BAILAPPLN.1303/2019etc. Page 1 of2 2019:DHC:7307
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
22.05.2019 After some hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petitions and the applications filed therewith, seeking liberty to file afresh, as the pleadings are deficient,since the version ofthe petitioners respecting' incident in question has not been properly and comprehensively set out,one i ofthe petitioners,namely.Ram Babu also having suffered injuries,he rather j being a victim than the assailant.
The petitions and the applications filed therewith are dismissed as , withdrawn with liberty as prayed for granted.
^ R.K.GAUBA,J.
MAY 22,2019 vk BAILAPPLN.1303/2019etc. Page2of2
2019:DHC:7307
JUDGMENT