Commissioner of Income Tax v. CLIX Finance India Pvt. Ltd

Delhi High Court · 29 Jul 2019 · 2019:DHC:7416-DB
S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh
ITA 639/2019
2019:DHC:7416-DB
tax appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of an excessive addition under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act where the assessee did not disclose any expenditure on earning dividend income.

Full Text
Translation output
(D $-73 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ITA 639/2017
COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX Appellant
Through: Mr.Zoheb Hossain,Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue
VERSUS
CLIX FINANCE INDIA PVT.LTD Respondent
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
16.07.2019 CM APPLs.31437-31438/2019
ORDER

1. For the reasons explained in the applications, the delay in filing and re filing the appeal is condoned and the applications are allowed. ITA 639/2019

2. The issueiurged by the Revenue in the present appeal against the.order dated ll''^ June 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) in ITA No. 762/Del/2016 for the Assessment Year(AY)2009-10 concerns the deletion by the ITAT ofan addition ofRs.28,67,29,284/- under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules(Rules).

3. The ITAT set aside the addition made by the Assessing Officer(AO)on the ground that Assessee had not disclosed any expenditure incurred on 2019:DHC:7416-DB earning the dividend income.

4. The fact ofthe matter is that in the present case,the AO appears to have made an addition which admittedly is in excess ofthe dividend income.This Court hasinHTMedia Ltd. v.PrincipalCIT,399ITR 576(Del),in similar circumstances deleted such addition. In the facts and circumstances of the present case,on this issue,no substantial question oflaw arises.

5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

S.MURALIDHAR,J.

TALWANT SINGKCJ- JULY 16,2019 m o & $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 639/2019 PR.COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX-2,DELHI Appellant Through: None.

VERSUS

M/S CLIX FINANCEINDIA PVT.LTD...... Respondent Through: Mr Sachit Jolly and Mr Aarush Bhatia,Advocates. CORAM: IV^- - ORDER % 29.07.2019

1. The office note has been pemsed.The corrected order shall read as under: "ITA 639/2019 COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue

VERSUS

CLIX FINANCEINDIA PVT.LTD Respondent CORAM: » ORDER % 16.07.2019 CM APPLs.31437-31438/2019

1. For the reasons explained in the applications, the delay in.filing and re-filing the appeal is condoned and the applications are allowed. ITA 639/2019

2. The issue urged by the Revenue in the present appeal against the order dated. 11th June 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No. 762/Del/2016 for the Assessment Year(AY)2009-10 concerns the deletion by the ITAT of an addition of Rs. 28,67,29,284/- under Section 14A ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D ofthe Income Tax Rules(Rules).; \

3. The ITAT set aside the addition made by the Assessing Officer(AO)on the ground that Assessee had not disclosed any expenditure incurred on earning the dividend income.

2,884 characters total

4. The fact of the matter is that in the present case, the AO appears to have made an addition which admittedly is in excess of the dividend income. This Court has in H T Media Ltd. v. Principal GIT, 399 ITR 576 (Del), in similar circumstances deleted such addition. In the facts and circumstances of the present case,on this issue,no substantial question oflaw arises.

5. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. JULY 29,2019 rd S.M LIDHAR,J. TALWANT SINGH,J.