Commissioner of Income Tax -3 v. DU Securities Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · 23 Jul 2019 · 2019:DHC:7418-DB
S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh
ITA 680/2019
2019:DHC:7418-DB
tax appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals and upheld the ITAT's reduction of commission rate from 2.25% to 0.5% on accommodation entries, emphasizing finality in tax litigation.

Full Text
Translation output
(> $-84,85,87& 89 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ITA 680/2019
THEPR.COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX -3 Appellant
Through Mr.Ruchir Bhatia,Advocate
VERSUS
DU SECURITIES PVT.LTD. Respondent
Through None
ITA 681/2019
VERSUS
DU SECURITIESPVT.LTD. Respondent
ITA 683/2019
THEPR.COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX-3 Appellant
VERSUS
DU SECURITIES PVT.LTD. ..... Respondent
ITA 685/2019
VERSUS
2019:DHC:7418-DB (1 DU SECURITIES PVT.LTD. Respondent
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
23.07.2019
ORDER

1. These appeals have been filed by the Revenue against the common order dated 23'"'^ January, 2019 passed by the ITAT in ITA Nos. 487/Del/2015, 489/Del/2015, 485/Del/2015 & 486/Del/2015 for the Assessment Years 2007-2008, 2009-2010, 2005-2006 & 2006-2007 respectively. The short question sought to be urged by the Revenue is whether the ITAT has arbitrarily reduced the percentage of commission on the accommodation entries provided allegedly by the Assessee from 2.25%to 0.5%.

2. A perusal ofthe impugned order ofthe ITAT shows that this is a second round oflitigation.TheITAT has explained how the fixing ofthe percentage at[2].25% by the Assessing Officer was based on noting ofsome loose sheets which were seized during a search operation. The reliability ofthese notings are themselves in dispute.

3. Be that as it may,the ITAT has on a consideration ofthe entire facts and circumstances and considering that different rates are charged in different transactions formed the view that 0.5% should be taken as a reasonable rate ofprofit/commissioner in such activities.

4. This Court fails to appreciate how the said order oftheITAT gives rise to & any substantial question of law. Moreover, this is the second round of litigation and it has to end at some point. The Court sees no reason to interfere with the impugned order oftheITAT.

5. The appeals are dismissed. JULY 23,2019 mw S.MURALroHAR,J. TALWANT SINGH,J.