Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 31st July, 2019
JUDGMENT
51 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocates versus PHOOL SINGH AND ORS..... Respondents Through: Ms.Sugandh Kochhar, Advocate for Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate for respondents + W.P.(C) 5108/2017 & CM Appls. 21848/2017, 40944/2017 52 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner versus DEVENDER KUMAR AND ORS..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 5114/2017 & CM Appls. 21856/2017, 40822/2017 53 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner versus KARAMVIR AND ORS..... Respondents 2019:DHC:3730 + W.P.(C) 5143/2017 & CM Appls. 21925/2017, 40824/2017 54 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner versus DIWAN AND ORS..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 5153/2017 & CM Appls. 21998/2017, 40823/2017 55 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner versus BALBIR SINGH AND ORS..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 5156/2017 & CM Appls. 22014/2017, 40821/2017 56 NORTH DLEHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner versus BALWAN SINGH & ORS...... Respondents + W.P.(C) 5282/2017 & CM Appl. 22391/2017 57 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner versus SURENDER AND ANR..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 5289/2017 & CM Appl. 22408/2017 58 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner versus MATHEN SINGH & ORS..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 5290/2017 59 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner versus JAGPAL SINGH..... Respondent respondent + W.P.(C) 5582/2017 & CM Appl. 23412/2017 60 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner versus SUNIL DATT & ORS..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 5739/2017 & CM Appl. 23904/2017 61 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner versus KAPTAN SINGH AND ORS..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL)
1. The petitioners have challenged the recovery certificates issued by the Deputy Labour Commissioner for the implementation of the order dated 25th September, 2014 and 17th October, 2014 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 5034/2011.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide judgment dated 22nd February, 2019 in L.P.A. 109/2017 titled North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Workmen Working as Malies in Horticulture Dept. MCD, the Division Bench of this Court has set aside the judgment dated 25th September, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 5034/2011. The Division Bench has further held that no recovery would be made from the workmen who are working in the hospital. Relevant portion of the judgment dated 22nd February, 2019 is reproduced hereunder: “15. For the reasons stated above, we set aside the order dated 25.09.2014 passed by learned Single Judge allowing the appeal in terms of the conclusion rendered by the Tribunal. No cost.
16. As fairly agreed, we make it clear that no recovery would be made from those workmen, who are actually working in the hospitals. However, concession will not be applicable to those, who are not working in the hospital but are working as Malis in other places.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the writ petitions be allowed in view of the judgment of the Division Bench dated 22nd February, 2019 in L.P.A. 109/2017. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that none of the respondents in these petitions were working in the hospital.
4. The writ petitions are allowed and the impugned recovery certificates are set aside. Pending applications are also disposed of.
5. Copy of this judgment be given dasti to counsel for the parties under signatures of the Court Master. J.R. MIDHA, J. JULY 31, 2019 ds