Deepak Verma v. Ramesh Verma & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 07 Aug 2019 · 2019:DHC:7520
V. Kameswar Rao
CONT.CAS(C) 975/2018
2019:DHC:7520
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging SDMC action after the petitioner regularized alleged unauthorized construction by paying the compounding fee.

Full Text
Translation output
d $-57 & 58 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C) 975/2018
DEEPAK VERMA Petitioner / Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Adv.
Through:
VERSUS
RAMESH VERMA & ORS
Through: ....Respondents Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Standing Counsel for SDMC.
SI Amit Dutt, PS-Lajpat Nagar.
AND
W.P.(C) 13089/2018, CM No. 50845/2018
DEEPAK VERMA
Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Adv.
VERSUS
S.D.M.C. AND ORS. THROUGH: DY. COMMISSIONER &ORS ....Respondents
Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Standing Counsel for SDMC.
Mr. Darpan Sachdeva, Adv. for R5.
Mr. Jayant Kaushik and Ms. Garima Jindal, Advs. for R6.
SI Amit Dutt, PS-Lajpat Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
07.08.2019 A status report has been filed by the respondent SDMC. Para 6 of the status report reads as under:
“The pursuant to aforesaid action initiated by the answering respondent, the owner of the subject property filed application for getting the alleged excess coverage / deviations regularized vide file No. 65/B/UCR/CNZ/2018 dated an
2019:DHC:7520 12.12.2018. After scrutiny ofthe case, existing construction of the property has been regularized by the department after realizing amount of Rs.3,50,766/- towards compounding fee vide G-8, receipt No. 40441 dated 22.07.2019. ”
The status report is taken on record.
In view of the status report filed by the respondent SDMC, Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petitions, the petitions and the connected application are dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J AUGUST 07, 2019/7^ 2019:DHC:7520
JUDGMENT