Full Text
Translation output
<ip $-43 to 45(common order)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C.4303/2013
RAJIV KUMAR Petitioner
Through: - Mr.Aditya Vikram,Advocate 7-^ STATE & ORS
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C.4303/2013
RAJIV KUMAR Petitioner
Through: - Mr.Aditya Vikram,Advocate 7-^ STATE & ORS
VERSUS
Through:
CRL.M.C.4904/2014
CRL.M.C.645/2014
RAJIV KUMAR
Through:
Respondents Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja,AFP for the State with SI Bramha Prakash,PS
Kapashera Mr.S.P. Kaushal,Adv.for R-2& R-3.
Petitioner Mr.Aditya Vikram,Advocate
RAJIV KUMAR
Through:
Respondents Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja,AFP for the State with SI Bramha Prakash,PS
Kapashera Mr.S.P. Kaushal,Adv.for R-2& R-3.
Petitioner Mr.Aditya Vikram,Advocate
VERSUS
DEVENDER BHARDWAJ& ANR Respondents
Through: Mr.S.P. Kaushal,Adv.for R-1 Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja,APP for the
State with SI Bramha Prakash,PS Kapashera
Through: Mr.S.P. Kaushal,Adv.for R-1 Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja,APP for the
State with SI Bramha Prakash,PS Kapashera
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
09.08.2019 After some hearing the counsel for the petitioner submits that given the time lapse after the impugned orders having been passed,in the context of a case arising out of FIR No.193/2013 of Police Station Kapeshera, involving offences under section 307/34 ofthe Indian Penal Code,1860
09.08.2019 After some hearing the counsel for the petitioner submits that given the time lapse after the impugned orders having been passed,in the context of a case arising out of FIR No.193/2013 of Police Station Kapeshera, involving offences under section 307/34 ofthe Indian Penal Code,1860
CRL.M.C.4303/2013 etc. Page I of2
2019:DHC:7436 (IPC)and the lack ofprogress in the prosecution ofthe said case, as indeed in the cross-case ofthe opposite party arising out ofFIR No.194/2013, both being subject matter of challenge in revisional jurisdiction before the
District and Sessions Judge, New Delhi over the last several years, he is under instructions to withdraw these petitions for cancellation of bail under section 439(2)ofthe Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973(Cr.P.C.).
During the course of hearing, the delay in disposal of the revision petitions arising out ofafore mentioned two FIRs,pending on the file ofthe
District & Sessions Judge, New Delhi came to the fore. The District &
Sessions Judge, New Delhi is requested to expedite the adjudication on the said revision petitions, the parties before this court assuring their full co operation.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
.G AUGUST 09,2019 vk
2019:DHC:7436 (IPC)and the lack ofprogress in the prosecution ofthe said case, as indeed in the cross-case ofthe opposite party arising out ofFIR No.194/2013, both being subject matter of challenge in revisional jurisdiction before the
District and Sessions Judge, New Delhi over the last several years, he is under instructions to withdraw these petitions for cancellation of bail under section 439(2)ofthe Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973(Cr.P.C.).
During the course of hearing, the delay in disposal of the revision petitions arising out ofafore mentioned two FIRs,pending on the file ofthe
District & Sessions Judge, New Delhi came to the fore. The District &
Sessions Judge, New Delhi is requested to expedite the adjudication on the said revision petitions, the parties before this court assuring their full co operation.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
.G AUGUST 09,2019 vk
CRLM.C. 4303/2013 etc. Page 2of2
2019:DHC:7436
2019:DHC:7436
JUDGMENT