Sharry Kanqjia v. The State & Ors

Delhi High Court · 18 Sep 2019
Chander Shekhar
BAIL APPLN.2332/2019 & Crl.M.A.36102/2019
2019:DHC:7332
criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of anticipatory bail applications with liberty to file fresh applications before the Sessions Court, dismissing the current applications without expressing any opinion on their merits.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN.2332/2019 & Crl.M.A.36102/2019
SHARRY KANQJIA
Through:
Petitioner Mr. Lai Singh Thakur& Mr.Sudhir Tewatia,Advocates
VERSUS
THE STATE & ORS
Through:
WITH
Respondents Mr.Raghuvinder Verma,APP with SI Sandeep Shrivastava, PS:Shalimar
Bagh,Delhi
BAIL APPLN.2334/2019 & Crl.M.A.36107/2019
MADHU KANQJIA
Through:
Petitioner Mr.Lai Singh Thakur & Mr.Sudhir Tewatia,Advocates
VERSUS
THE STATE & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Verma,APP with SI Sandeep Shrivastava, PS:Shalimar
Bagh,Delhi
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
18.09.2019
ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the bail applications, with liberty to file bail applications under Section 438 ofthe Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973 before the Sessions Court. 2019:DHC:7332

2. Accordingly, the bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.Pending applications are also dismissed.

3. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits ofthe bail applications. Dasti. ^ CHAnteERSHEKHAR,J SEPTEMBER 18,2019 tp