Full Text
Translation output
3.
$-68,69&72 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C.1207/2019 & CRL.M.A.4722/2019
NIRMAL SINGH LAMBA Petitioner
Through: Ms.Vasundhara Nayyar,Advocate
$-68,69&72 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C.1207/2019 & CRL.M.A.4722/2019
NIRMAL SINGH LAMBA Petitioner
Through: Ms.Vasundhara Nayyar,Advocate
VERSUS
S P REALTORS Respondent
Through: Mr.Lavnish Kumar,Advocate
Through: Mr.Lavnish Kumar,Advocate
CRL.M.C.1225/2019& CRL.M.A.4781/2019
VERSUS
GAGAN PREET SINGH & ANR. Respondents
X CRL.M.C.1203/2019& CRL.M.A.4713/2019
VERSUS
HARLEEN KAUR SACHDEVA & ANR. Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
23.09.2019 2019:DHC:7515 CRL.M.As.4723/2019& 4782/2019(Exemption^
Allowed subjectto alljust exceptions.
23.09.2019 2019:DHC:7515 CRL.M.As.4723/2019& 4782/2019(Exemption^
Allowed subjectto alljust exceptions.
CRL.M.C.1207/2019.CRL.M.C.1225/2019& CRT.M.r.
1203/2019 Learned counsel for the respondentstates at bar thatthe petitioner did not issue cheque in question. He was not even director at the time of the issuance ofcheque.However,inadvertently he is impleaded as party in the complaint pending before the trial court.
Keeping in view the averments made in the present petition and the concession granted bythe learned counselfortherespondent,Iherebyquash the complaint and consequentproceedings emanating thereto.
The petition is accordingly allowed.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT,J SEPTEMBER 23,2019 V 2019:DHC:7515
1203/2019 Learned counsel for the respondentstates at bar thatthe petitioner did not issue cheque in question. He was not even director at the time of the issuance ofcheque.However,inadvertently he is impleaded as party in the complaint pending before the trial court.
Keeping in view the averments made in the present petition and the concession granted bythe learned counselfortherespondent,Iherebyquash the complaint and consequentproceedings emanating thereto.
The petition is accordingly allowed.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT,J SEPTEMBER 23,2019 V 2019:DHC:7515
JUDGMENT